In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements
[BUG]
Syzbot reports the following crash:
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): disabling free space tree
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1)
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2)
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f]
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:backup_super_roots fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1691 [inline]
RIP: 0010:write_all_supers+0x97a/0x40f0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4041
Call Trace:
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1eae/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2530
btrfs_delete_free_space_tree+0x383/0x730 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1312
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xf28/0x1300 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3012
btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1309 [inline]
btrfs_reconfigure+0xae6/0x2d40 fs/btrfs/super.c:1534
btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount fs/btrfs/super.c:2020 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2079 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0x918/0x1920 fs/btrfs/super.c:2115
vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1800
do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40 fs/namespace.c:3472
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3812 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4020 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3997
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[CAUSE]
To support mounting different subvolume with different RO/RW flags for
the new mount APIs, btrfs introduced two workaround to support this feature:
Combining these two, we can have the following sequence:
-
Mount the fs ro,rescue=all,clear_cache,space_cache=v1
rescue=all will mark the fs as hard read-only, so no v2 cache clearing
will happen.
-
Mount a subvolume rw of the same fs.
We go into btrfs_get_tree_subvol(), but fc_mount() returns EBUSY
because our new fc is RW, different from the original fs.
Now we enter btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(), which switches the RO flag
first so that we can grab the existing fs_info.
Then we reconfigure the fs to RW.
-
During reconfiguration, option/features check is skipped
This means we will restart the v2 cache clearing, and convert back to
v1 cache.
This will trigger fs writes, and since the original fs has "rescue=all"
option, it skips the csum tree read.
And eventually causing NULL pointer dereference in super block
writeback.
[FIX]
For reconfiguration caused by different subvolume RO/RW flags, ensure we
always run btrfs_check_options() to ensure we have proper hard RO
requirements met.
In fact the function btrfs_check_options() doesn't really do many
complex checks, but hard RO requirement and some feature dependency
checks, thus there is no special reason not to do the check for mount
reconfiguration.
References
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements
[BUG]
Syzbot reports the following crash:
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): disabling free space tree
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1)
BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2)
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f]
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:backup_super_roots fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1691 [inline]
RIP: 0010:write_all_supers+0x97a/0x40f0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4041
Call Trace:
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1eae/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2530
btrfs_delete_free_space_tree+0x383/0x730 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1312
btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xf28/0x1300 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3012
btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1309 [inline]
btrfs_reconfigure+0xae6/0x2d40 fs/btrfs/super.c:1534
btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount fs/btrfs/super.c:2020 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2079 [inline]
btrfs_get_tree+0x918/0x1920 fs/btrfs/super.c:2115
vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1800
do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40 fs/namespace.c:3472
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3812 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4020 [inline]
__se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3997
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[CAUSE]
To support mounting different subvolume with different RO/RW flags for
the new mount APIs, btrfs introduced two workaround to support this feature:
Skip mount option/feature checks if we are mounting a different
subvolume
Reconfigure the fs to RW if the initial mount is RO
Combining these two, we can have the following sequence:
Mount the fs ro,rescue=all,clear_cache,space_cache=v1
rescue=all will mark the fs as hard read-only, so no v2 cache clearing
will happen.
Mount a subvolume rw of the same fs.
We go into btrfs_get_tree_subvol(), but fc_mount() returns EBUSY
because our new fc is RW, different from the original fs.
Now we enter btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(), which switches the RO flag
first so that we can grab the existing fs_info.
Then we reconfigure the fs to RW.
During reconfiguration, option/features check is skipped
This means we will restart the v2 cache clearing, and convert back to
v1 cache.
This will trigger fs writes, and since the original fs has "rescue=all"
option, it skips the csum tree read.
And eventually causing NULL pointer dereference in super block
writeback.
[FIX]
For reconfiguration caused by different subvolume RO/RW flags, ensure we
always run btrfs_check_options() to ensure we have proper hard RO
requirements met.
In fact the function btrfs_check_options() doesn't really do many
complex checks, but hard RO requirement and some feature dependency
checks, thus there is no special reason not to do the check for mount
reconfiguration.
References