Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: (airbyte-protocol) add new record message type #102
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat: (airbyte-protocol) add new record message type #102
Changes from 1 commit
3702f58
009278c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: It feels weird to me to see fields like
namespace
andstream
(which I assume isstream_name
) as it feels like the StreamDescriptor concept we already have. Why don't we re-use it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Revisiting
namespace
is not needed; I will remove it; thanks for making me give a second check on this.Well, we could, but I think it would require us to make changes on the platform (and destination?) side, as the current structure is similar to a record, where stream is a string rather than an object.
File record sample:
Regular record sample
Stream descriptor from state message:
{"stream_descriptor":{"name":"random_data_10"}
Currently StreamDescriptor is used for
AirbyteStreamState
,AirbyteErrorTraceMessage
,AirbyteStreamStatusTraceMessage
. It would depend on platform expectations if we can simply change this or coordinate changes.cc @benmoriceau @tryangul
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The data is not needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I recall, we agreed to have an empty data key, but if not really needed, I'm happy to 🪓
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed.