-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(declarative): Pass extra_fields
in global_substream_cursor
#195
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant GS as GlobalSubstreamCursor
participant SS as StreamSlice
GS->>SS: Create StreamSlice
SS-->>GS: StreamSlice with extra_fields
Hey there! 👋 I noticed you're adding 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/global_substream_cursor.py (1)
131-131
: Balanced approach forgenerate_slices_from_partition
.
Great to see the same approach for passingextra_fields
here. Would you be open to adding a simple test to confirm thatextra_fields
is successfully set in these generated slices as well? wdyt?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/global_substream_cursor.py
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/global_substream_cursor.py (1)
115-115
: Consider verifying the presence ofextra_fields
in the partition.
Would you like to add a quick check or default behavior in caseextra_fields
is missing or unexpected in the partition? wdyt?
extra_fields
in global_substream_cursor
extra_fields
in global_substream_cursor
/autofix |
I do not see how the failing test has any connection with the code I am changing.... |
per_partition_cursor correctly passes
extra_fields
to StreamSlice from partition.global_substream_cursor
does not.I did not have an idea how to test this properly.
Summary by CodeRabbit
GlobalSubstreamCursor
to support additional contextual information in stream slices.