chore(documentation): Fix header for CDK migration 6.0.0 #95
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates the migration guide for upgrading to version 6.0.0 of the CDK. It changes the section title to reflect the specific version and clarifies the introduction of concurrent processing for low-code incremental streams, which necessitates breaking changes for certain connectors. The guide details necessary modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CDK
participant SourceName
participant Run
User->>CDK: Initiate migration to 6.0.0
CDK->>SourceName: Update constructor with catalog, config, state
CDK->>Run: Update _get_source to pass new parameters
CDK->>manifest.yaml: Add concurrency_level component
Run->>SourceName: Instantiate with new parameters
Note right of SourceName: Handle concurrent processing
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
cdk-migrations.md (3)
Line range hint
32-39: Would you like to add some inline comments to the code examples? wdyt?The code examples are well-structured, but adding a few inline comments could make them even more helpful, especially for the
run.pychanges. For example:def _get_source(args: List[str]): + # Extract paths from command line arguments catalog_path = AirbyteEntrypoint.extract_catalog(args) config_path = AirbyteEntrypoint.extract_config(args) state_path = AirbyteEntrypoint.extract_state(args) try: + # Initialize source with extracted configurations return SourceName( SourceName.read_catalog(catalog_path) if catalog_path else None, SourceName.read_config(config_path) if config_path else None, SourceName.read_state(state_path) if state_path else None, )Also applies to: 42-67
Line range hint
5-11: Would you like to add testing recommendations for the concurrent processing changes? wdyt?The introduction to concurrent processing is clear, but it might be helpful to add a note about recommended testing approaches. Something like:
> [!NOTE] > When testing these changes, it's recommended to: > - Compare sync results between sequential and concurrent processing > - Test with different concurrency levels > - Monitor memory usage during concurrent syncs
1-1: Would you like to add a table of contents at the top? wdyt?Since this is a comprehensive migration guide covering multiple versions, a table of contents could help readers quickly navigate to the relevant section. Something like:
# CDK Migration Guide ## Table of Contents - [Upgrading to 6.0.0](#upgrading-to-600) - [Upgrading to 5.0.0](#upgrading-to-500) - [Upgrading to 4.5.0](#upgrading-to-450) ...
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cdk-migrations.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cdk-migrations.md (1)
3-3: LGTM! Header formatting is now consistent
The header now correctly specifies version 6.0.0, which aligns better with other version headers in the document and accurately reflects the specific version being discussed.
Small change to align the headers in the CDK migration guide with the other headers we have
Summary by CodeRabbit
source.pyandrun.pyfor compatibility with new method signatures.