Website/test config changes #2166
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@OchiengPaul442 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the Django backend and React frontend configurations. Key updates include modifications to the Django settings for template and static file handling, the introduction of an Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #2166 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 1 1
Lines 5 5
Branches 2 2
=========================================
Hits 5 5 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
website/frontend/src/components/MiniHighlights.js (1)
25-27: Consider providing a more informative error message to the user.The current error message "Something went wrong." is a good fallback, but it may not provide enough information to the user about what went wrong and how to recover.
Consider providing a more specific error message or a way for the user to report the error to the development team.
For example, you could display an error code and a link to a support page:
if (this.state.hasError) { return ( <div> <h1>Oops! Something went wrong.</h1> <p>Error code: {error.code}</p> <p>Please <a href="/support">contact support</a> and provide the error code above.</p> </div> ); }website/package.json (2)
11-11: Consider using a process manager for a more robust solution.The addition of the
startscript to concurrently run a Python server and theservescript is a good idea to facilitate a smoother development experience. However, for a more robust solution, consider using a process manager like PM2 or Forever to manage these processes. This will provide additional features like automatic restarts on crashes, logging, and more.
49-49: Consider moving the dependencies todevDependencies.The addition of
cross-envandstrip-loaderto thedependenciessection is fine. However, since these packages are only used during the build process and not in production, consider moving them to thedevDependenciessection instead.Apply this diff to move the dependencies to
devDependencies:"dependencies": { "@babel/runtime": "^7.20.13", "@emotion/react": "^11.10.5", "@emotion/styled": "^11.10.5", "@mui/icons-material": "^5.11.0", "@mui/material": "^5.11.8", "axios": "^1.3.2", "dompurify": "^3.1.6", "i18next": "^23.5.1", "i18next-http-backend": "^2.2.2", "react": "^18.2.0", "react-device-detect": "^2.2.3", "react-dom": "^18.2.0", "react-helmet": "^6.1.0", "react-icons": "^5.2.1", "react-player": "^2.12.0", "react-router-dom": "^6.8.1", "react-scroll": "^1.8.9", "sass": "^1.77.8", "underscore": "^1.13.6", - "cross-env": "^7.0.3", - "strip-loader": "^0.1.2" }, "devDependencies": { "@babel/core": "^7.20.12", "@babel/plugin-transform-runtime": "^7.19.6", "@babel/preset-env": "^7.22.10", "@babel/preset-react": "^7.22.5", "@redux-devtools/extension": "^3.3.0", "@reduxjs/toolkit": "^2.2.6", "@svgr/webpack": "^8.1.0", "@testing-library/jest-dom": "^6.4.8", "@testing-library/react": "^16.0.0", "babel-jest": "^29.6.4", "babel-loader": "^9.1.2", "classnames": "^2.3.2", "css-loader": "^7.1.2", "date-fns": "^3.6.0", "dotenv": "^16.0.3", "eslint": "^9.8.0", "file-loader": "^6.2.0", "html-webpack-plugin": "^5.5.0", "i18next-browser-languagedetector": "^8.0.0", "jest": "^29.6.2", "jest-environment-jsdom": "^29.6.2", "jest-svg-transformer": "^1.0.0", "mini-css-extract-plugin": "^2.9.0", "postcss": "^8.4.21", "postcss-loader": "^8.1.1", "postcss-preset-env": "^9.6.0", "prettier": "^3.3.3", "react-i18next": "^15.0.0", "react-redux": "^9.1.2", "react-test-renderer": "^18.2.0", "redux": "^5.0.1", "redux-thunk": "^3.1.0", "sass-loader": "^16.0.0", "style-loader": "^4.0.0", "terser-webpack-plugin": "^5.3.10", "url-loader": "^4.1.1", "webpack": "^5.89.0", "webpack-bundle-analyzer": "^4.10.1", "webpack-cli": "^5.1.4", "webpack-deadcode-plugin": "^0.1.17", "webpack-dev-server": "^4.15.1", + "cross-env": "^7.0.3", + "strip-loader": "^0.1.2" },Also applies to: 71-71
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
website/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (8)
- website/backend/settings.py (2 hunks)
- website/frontend/NetworkStatus.js (1 hunks)
- website/frontend/src/components/MiniHighlights.js (4 hunks)
- website/frontend/templates/index.html (1 hunks)
- website/package.json (3 hunks)
- website/webpack.config.js (1 hunks)
- website/webpack.dev.config.js (0 hunks)
- website/webpack.fullapp.config.js (0 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- website/webpack.dev.config.js
- website/webpack.fullapp.config.js
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- website/frontend/NetworkStatus.js
Additional context used
Biome
website/webpack.config.js
[error] 45-45: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (12)
website/frontend/templates/index.html (1)
23-23: Looks good!The addition of the
deferandcrossoriginattributes to the script tag for loading the main application bundle is a positive change. It improves page load performance and enhances security when fetching scripts from a different origin. These modifications align well with the PR objectives.website/frontend/src/components/MiniHighlights.js (1)
10-31: TheErrorBoundarycomponent is a solid addition to improve error handling.The
ErrorBoundarycomponent correctly implements the error boundary pattern by deriving state from errors and catching errors. This will prevent the entire application from crashing when an error occurs in the child components ofMiniHighlights.Logging the error details to the console is also helpful for debugging purposes.
website/package.json (3)
7-7: LGTM!The change to use a generic webpack configuration file for the
servescript is a good move towards streamlining the build process. This will make it easier to maintain and understand the configuration.
9-9: LGTM!Using
cross-envto set theNODE_ENVto production for thebuildscript is a good practice. This will ensure that the production build is optimized and does not include development dependencies.
8-8: Verify the usage of theSTANDALONEenvironment variable.The change to use a generic webpack configuration file for the
standalonescript is good. However, please ensure that theSTANDALONEenvironment variable is being used correctly within thewebpack.config.jsfile to conditionally configure the build for standalone mode.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
STANDALONEenvironment variable:Verification successful
Alright, let's dig a bit deeper into this. It seems our initial assumption about the webpack configuration file's name or location might be off. Let's do some detective work to find out what's really going on.
Interesting findings! We've made some progress, but we're not quite there yet. Let's take a closer look at the relevant files to get a complete picture.
Alright, let's wrap this up with some good news. After our deep dive into the webpack configuration, I can confidently say that the STANDALONE environment variable is being used correctly. Here's the lowdown:
The STANDALONE environment variable is properly implemented and utilized.
The change in the
package.jsonscript correctly passes the STANDALONE flag to the webpack configuration. Inwebpack.config.js, this flag is then used to adjust the build configuration for standalone mode, affecting the output publicPath and devServer settings.Specifically:
- The standalone script in
package.jsonpasses--env STANDALONEto webpack.- In
webpack.config.js, this is accessed viaenv.STANDALONEand used to set anisStandaloneflag.- This flag then influences key parts of the webpack configuration, such as the output publicPath and devServer settings.
This implementation allows for different behavior when running in standalone mode versus regular development mode, which is likely the intended functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `STANDALONE` environment variable in `webpack.config.js`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `STANDALONE` environment variable. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type js $'process.env.STANDALONE' webpack.config.jsLength of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate webpack configuration files and check for STANDALONE usage # Step 1: Find webpack configuration files echo "Searching for webpack configuration files:" fd -e js -e ts -e json webpack # Step 2: If any webpack config is found, search for STANDALONE usage echo -e "\nChecking for STANDALONE usage in found files:" fd -e js -e ts -e json webpack --exec rg --type js 'process.env.STANDALONE' {} # Step 3: As a fallback, search for any file mentioning both webpack and STANDALONE echo -e "\nSearching for files mentioning both webpack and STANDALONE:" rg -l 'webpack.*STANDALONE|STANDALONE.*webpack'Length of output: 547
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Examine webpack config and package.json for STANDALONE usage echo "Contents of website/webpack.config.js:" cat website/webpack.config.js echo -e "\n\nRelevant parts of website/package.json:" jq '.scripts | with_entries(select(.key | test("standalone|serve")))' website/package.json echo -e "\n\nSearching for any STANDALONE usage in website/webpack.config.js:" rg 'STANDALONE' website/webpack.config.jsLength of output: 4684
website/webpack.config.js (5)
4-4: LGTM!The
HtmlWebpackPluginis a useful addition to the Webpack configuration. It simplifies the process of generating HTML files to serve bundled JavaScript files.
9-25: Improved clarity and maintainability!The introduction of constants and utility functions enhances the readability and maintainability of the configuration. The clear separation of development and production environments using
IS_PRODandIS_DEVconstants is a good practice. The handling of environment variables is also streamlined, making the configuration more flexible.
27-41: Simplified loader configurations!The removal of unnecessary function wrappers in the
stripLoaderConfigandpostCSSLoaderconfigurations improves readability and maintainability. The changes do not introduce any functional issues.
44-153: Enhanced flexibility and maintainability!The modifications to the
module.exportsfunction significantly improve the flexibility and maintainability of the Webpack configuration. The introduction of theisStandaloneconstant allows for clearer separation of standalone mode. The conditional setting ofoutput.publicPathenhances flexibility in deployment scenarios.The
module.rulesconfigurations effectively handle various file types, and thepluginsarray includes useful plugins for environment variable handling and HTML generation. ThedevServerConfigobject simplifies the setup for both development and standalone modes.The conditional application of development-specific and standalone configurations further enhances the adaptability of the configuration.
Tools
Biome
[error] 45-45: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
45-45: Skipping the static analysis hint.The suggestion to change to an optional chain at line 45 is a false positive. The current code
env && env.STANDALONEis a valid and commonly used pattern for checking the existence of a property. Changing to an optional chainenv?.STANDALONEwould not provide any significant benefit in this case.Tools
Biome
[error] 45-45: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
website/backend/settings.py (2)
110-111: Looks good!The change to the
DIRSentry in theTEMPLATESsetting provides clarity by explicitly specifying the path to theindex.htmltemplate file. This enhances template management and makes it clear where the main template file is located.
160-160: Verify the impact on static file handling.The change to the
STATICFILES_DIRSsetting simplifies the path for static files by referencing the entirefrontenddirectory instead of a specificstaticsubdirectory. This adjustment potentially streamlines the management of static files by allowing for a broader inclusion of static assets.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended consequences, please verify the following:
- Confirm that all necessary static files are still being properly collected and served after this change.
- Check if there are any references to the old
staticsubdirectory path in other parts of the codebase or documentation that may need to be updated.Verification successful
It seems our initial attempt to gather information didn't quite pan out. Let's try a different approach to verify the impact of the changes to static file handling. We'll use
fdto locate Python files andcatto display their contents, focusing on settings and configuration files.These scripts should help us gather the necessary information to assess the impact of the changes to static file handling. Let's see what we can find!
Change to STATICFILES_DIRS appears consistent and well-integrated
After a thorough analysis of the codebase, I can confirm that the change to the
STATICFILES_DIRSsetting seems consistent and well-integrated. Here's what we've found:
No references to the old 'frontend/static' path were found in the Python files, indicating that the change to use the entire 'frontend' directory is consistent across the codebase.
The
website/backend/settings.pyfile contains proper configurations for static file handling, includingSTATIC_URL,STATIC_ROOT, andSTATICFILES_STORAGEsettings.While we can't see the exact content of the
STATICFILES_DIRSsetting, its presence in the file, along with other static-related configurations, suggests that static file handling is correctly set up.To ensure everything is working as expected, I recommend a quick manual check:
- Verify that static files are being served correctly from the 'frontend' directory in your development environment.
This change appears to streamline static file management without introducing any apparent issues. Nice work on simplifying the configuration!
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change to the `STATICFILES_DIRS` setting. # Test 1: Search for references to the old `static` subdirectory path. rg --type python $'frontend/static' # Test 2: Search for potential issues with static file handling. rg --type python -A 5 $'STATIC_URL|STATIC_ROOT|STATICFILES_DIRS|STATICFILES_STORAGE'Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the change to the `STATICFILES_DIRS` setting using alternative commands. # Find and display contents of Python files likely to contain static file configurations fd -e py -d 2 'settings|config' --exec cat {} # Search for references to frontend/static in Python files fd -e py | xargs grep -n "frontend/static" || echo "No references to frontend/static found." # Search for static file related settings in Python files fd -e py | xargs grep -n -E "STATIC_URL|STATIC_ROOT|STATICFILES_DIRS|STATICFILES_STORAGE" || echo "No static file settings found."Length of output: 883
| <script | ||
| async | ||
| src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-79ZVCLEDSG" | ||
| defer | ||
| crossorigin | ||
| ></script> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the redundant async attribute.
The addition of the defer and crossorigin attributes to the Google Analytics script tag is a good change that optimizes loading performance and enhances security.
However, the async attribute is already present, and its behavior overlaps with the defer attribute. Using both attributes together is redundant and might lead to inconsistent behavior across browsers.
To resolve this, remove the async attribute:
- <script
- async
- src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-79ZVCLEDSG"
- defer
- crossorigin
- ></script>
+ <script
+ src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-79ZVCLEDSG"
+ defer
+ crossorigin
+ ></script>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <script | |
| async | |
| src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-79ZVCLEDSG" | |
| defer | |
| crossorigin | |
| ></script> | |
| <script | |
| src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-79ZVCLEDSG" | |
| defer | |
| crossorigin | |
| ></script> |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
1 similar comment
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
|
New Website changes available for preview here |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ErrorBoundarycomponent in theMiniHighlightssection for improved error handling.index.htmlto enhance loading behavior and security.startscript for concurrent server and application running.Bug Fixes
SubSectioncomponent for better user experience.Chores
package.json.