analytics: fix for add location (Re-use dispatch) #2202
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
New next-platform changes available for preview here |
1 similar comment
|
New next-platform changes available for preview here |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/modules/AddLocations.jsx (1)
Line range hint
103-147: Consider enhancing maintainability of handleSubmit.The function handles multiple responsibilities and could benefit from some refinements:
- Extract validation logic into a separate function
- Use constants for magic numbers:
const MAX_LOCATIONS = 4;
- Consider more descriptive error messages:
setError('Please select at least one location'); setError(`Maximum ${MAX_LOCATIONS} locations allowed`);Would you like me to provide a complete refactored version of the handleSubmit function?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/modules/AddLocations.jsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/modules/AddLocations.jsx (2)
9-9: LGTM! Clean transition to Redux dispatch pattern.The import change aligns well with the shift from hooks to Redux dispatch pattern for managing user preferences.
137-139: Verify Redux store updates across the application.Let's ensure the Redux store updates are properly propagated to other components that might depend on user preferences.
✅ Verification successful
Redux store updates are properly integrated across the application
The implementation is correctly integrated with the Redux ecosystem:
- The action is properly defined in UserDefaultsSlice and handles all states (pending/fulfilled/rejected)
- Multiple components consume the individual preferences state, showing proper data flow
- The dispatch is used consistently across the application in key areas:
- Login flow
- User preferences hook
- Data download modal
- Various UI components (charts, cards, analytics)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components that might be affected by user preferences updates # Look for components subscribing to individual_preferences echo "Components using individual_preferences:" rg -l "state\.defaults\.individual_preferences" --type jsx # Look for other uses of getIndividualUserPreferences echo "\nOther components using getIndividualUserPreferences:" rg "getIndividualUserPreferences" --type jsxLength of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try without specifying file type and use proper patterns echo "Components using individual preferences in state:" rg -l "state\.[^.]+\.individual_preferences" echo -e "\nComponents dispatching getIndividualUserPreferences:" rg "getIndividualUserPreferences\(" echo -e "\nComponents importing getIndividualUserPreferences:" rg "import.*getIndividualUserPreferences" # Let's also check the Redux action and reducer echo -e "\nRedux implementation of individual preferences:" rg -A 5 "getIndividualUserPreferences.*=.*"Length of output: 3604
| if (userID) { | ||
| useUserPreferences(); | ||
| dispatch(getIndividualUserPreferences(userID)); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for the preferences fetch.
While the dispatch to update preferences is well-placed, consider handling potential errors from getIndividualUserPreferences to ensure a robust user experience.
Here's a suggested improvement:
dispatch(replaceUserPreferences(payload))
.then(() => {
onClose();
if (userID) {
- dispatch(getIndividualUserPreferences(userID));
+ return dispatch(getIndividualUserPreferences(userID))
+ .catch(err => {
+ console.error('Failed to refresh preferences:', err);
+ // Optionally show a toast/notification while keeping the update
+ });
}
dispatch(setRefreshChart(true));
})Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes