-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
code clean up and optimization #2329
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new function, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/components/CustomFields.jsx (1)
17-27
: LGTM! Consider adding input validation.The
formatFieldValue
function is well-implemented with clear documentation. However, it might benefit from input validation similar toformatName
.const formatFieldValue = (value, fieldId, textFormat) => { + if (typeof value !== 'string' || !value) return value; if (fieldId === 'organization') { return value.toUpperCase(); } return formatName(value, textFormat); };
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/modules/DataDownload.jsx (1)
123-125
: Consider adding error handling for empty organization name.While converting organization name to lowercase is good for consistency, we should handle cases where the organization name might be undefined.
dispatch( - fetchSitesSummary({ group: formData.organization.name.toLowerCase() }), + fetchSitesSummary({ + group: formData.organization?.name?.toLowerCase() || 'default' + }), );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/components/CustomFields.jsx
(4 hunks)platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/modules/DataDownload.jsx
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
platform/src/common/components/Modal/dataDownload/components/CustomFields.jsx (3)
47-47
: LGTM! Robust state initialization.
The defensive initialization with empty defaults for id and name prevents potential undefined errors when options array is empty.
58-58
: LGTM! Consistent formatting implementation.
The handleSelect
function correctly uses formatFieldValue
to maintain consistent formatting across the component.
74-76
: LGTM! UI formatting is consistent.
The component consistently applies formatting across both input field and dropdown, ensuring a uniform display of values.
Also applies to: 101-101
New next-platform changes available for preview here |
New next-platform changes available for preview here |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes