Enhance authentication flow with loading indicators and error handlin… #2346
Conversation
…g; improve Hive data retrieval safety
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request focuses on enhancing type safety, error handling, and robustness across multiple files in the mobile application. The changes primarily involve improving null handling, adding more precise type annotations, and implementing better error logging mechanisms. Key modifications span critical components like authentication, theme management, user profile loading, and repository interactions. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/auth/pages/login_page.dart (1)
Line range hint
85-89: Enhance form validation for better securityWhile the null safety improvements are good, the validation could be strengthened for better security and user experience.
Consider implementing:
validator: (value) { if (value == null || value.isEmpty) { return "This field cannot be blank."; } + if (value.length < 8) { + return "Password must be at least 8 characters long"; + } + if (!value.contains(RegExp(r'[A-Z]')) || + !value.contains(RegExp(r'[a-z]')) || + !value.contains(RegExp(r'[0-9]'))) { + return "Password must contain uppercase, lowercase, and numbers"; + } return null; },For email validation:
validator: (value) { if (value == null || value.isEmpty) { return "This field cannot be blank."; } + final emailRegex = RegExp(r'^[\w-\.]+@([\w-]+\.)+[\w-]{2,4}$'); + if (!emailRegex.hasMatch(value)) { + return "Please enter a valid email address"; + } return null; },Also applies to: 103-107
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/profile/repository/user_repository.dart (1)
Line range hint
16-22: Add error handling for profile responseThe profile request lacks error handling, which could lead to crashes if the server returns an error response.
Consider adding try-catch and response validation:
+ try { Response profileResponse = await createAuthenticatedGetRequest("/api/v2/users/${userId}", {}); + if (profileResponse.statusCode != 200) { + throw Exception('Failed to load profile: ${profileResponse.statusCode}'); + } ProfileResponseModel model = profileResponseModelFromJson(profileResponse.body); return model; + } catch (e) { + logError('Error loading user profile: $e'); + rethrow; + }
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/auth/pages/login_page.dart (2)
133-137: Improve form submission UXThe null safety improvements are good, but the user experience during form submission could be enhanced.
Consider these improvements:
onTap: loading ? null : () { + setState(() => error = null); // Clear previous errors final currentForm = formKey.currentState; if (currentForm != null && currentForm.validate()) { + // Provide immediate feedback + ScaffoldMessenger.of(context).showSnackBar( + SnackBar(content: Text('Signing in...')), + ); authBloc.add(LoginUser( emailController.text.trim(), passwordController.text.trim())); } },
Line range hint
36-52: Consider implementing a more comprehensive loading and error handling strategyWhile the current implementation handles basic loading states and errors, consider implementing a more robust error handling strategy that aligns with the PR objectives:
- Use a dedicated error handling widget for consistent error display
- Implement retry mechanisms for failed authentication attempts
- Add loading indicators for intermediate states (e.g., password validation)
Would you like me to provide a sample implementation of a reusable error handling widget?
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/other/theme/repository/theme_repository.dart (2)
19-19: Consider refactoring theme handlingWhile the null handling is good, we can improve the code structure:
- Extract theme values as constants:
class ThemeConstants { static const String light = 'light'; static const String dark = 'dark'; static const String defaultTheme = light; }
- Consider using an enum for type safety:
enum AppTheme { light, dark }This would make the code more maintainable and type-safe.
Line range hint
11-23: Consolidate theme persistence logicThe theme switching logic could be more concise.
Consider this refactor:
Future<String> getTheme(bool switchTheme) async { String theme = await HiveRepository.getData("theme", "themeBox") ?? "light"; if (switchTheme) { - if (theme == "light") { - await HiveRepository.saveData("themeBox", "theme", "dark"); - } else { - await HiveRepository.saveData("themeBox", "theme", "light"); - } - String newTheme = await HiveRepository.getData("theme", "themeBox") ?? "light"; - return newTheme; + final newTheme = theme == "light" ? "dark" : "light"; + await HiveRepository.saveData("themeBox", "theme", newTheme); + return newTheme; } return theme; }mobile-v3/lib/main.dart (1)
165-169: Enhance loading state UIWhile the CircularProgressIndicator is functional, consider adding a branded loading screen for a better user experience.
Consider this enhancement:
if (snapshot.connectionState == ConnectionState.waiting) { return Scaffold( - body: Center(child: CircularProgressIndicator()), + body: Center( + child: Column( + mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center, + children: [ + CircularProgressIndicator(), + SizedBox(height: 16), + Text('Loading AirQo...'), + ], + ), + ), ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart(2 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/auth/pages/login_page.dart(5 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/other/theme/repository/theme_repository.dart(1 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/profile/repository/user_repository.dart(1 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart(1 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/hive_repository.dart(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/hive_repository.dart (1)
2-2: Consider adding loggy initialization
While adding loggy for error logging is great, we should ensure it's properly initialized.
Let's check if loggy is initialized in the app:
✅ Verification successful
Loggy is already properly initialized ✅
The package is correctly initialized in mobile-v3/lib/main.dart with proper configuration including a pretty printer and log levels.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for loggy initialization
rg "with\s+Loggy" --type dart
Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to find Loggy initialization
rg "Loggy\." --type dart -A 3
# Also search for main function which might contain initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'void main() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 284
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart (2)
173-174: LGTM: Proper error logging
Good use of logError with context for debugging purposes.
184-186: LGTM: Informative logging
Good practice to include navigation context in logs.
| @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ class LoginPage extends StatefulWidget { | |||
|
|
|||
| class _LoginPageState extends State<LoginPage> { | |||
| String? error; | |||
| AuthBloc? authBloc; | |||
| late AuthBloc authBloc; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider a safer initialization pattern for AuthBloc
The current implementation using late could lead to runtime errors if build() is called before initState() completes or if context.read() fails.
Consider this safer approach:
- late AuthBloc authBloc;
+ AuthBloc? authBloc;
@override
void initState() {
super.initState();
- authBloc = context.read<AuthBloc>();
+ try {
+ authBloc = context.read<AuthBloc>();
+ } catch (e) {
+ print('Failed to initialize AuthBloc: $e');
+ }
}Also applies to: 32-32
| static Future<String?> getData(String key, String boxName) async { | ||
| try { | ||
| var box = await Hive.openBox(boxName); | ||
| var value = box.get(key); | ||
| return value is String ? value : null; | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| logError('Error retrieving data from Hive: $e'); | ||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Potential null safety concerns in getData usage 🚨
The verification reveals several instances where getData's null return isn't properly handled:
user_repository.dart: Unsafe cast withas Stringwhich could throw at runtimebase_repository.dart: Dangerous non-null assertion (!) in authenticated request- Other usages properly handle null with null-coalescing (
??) or null-aware patterns
Suggested fixes:
- In
user_repository.dart: Replaceas Stringwith null check and error handling - In
base_repository.dart: Add proper null handling for token instead of force unwrapping
🔗 Analysis chain
Excellent improvements to type safety and error handling! 👍
The changes to getData method significantly improve robustness:
- Type-safe return value with
Future<String?> - Proper error handling with try-catch
- Explicit type checking for returned values
- Error logging for debugging
Let's verify the usage of this method across the codebase to ensure we're handling null returns:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for getData calls that might need null handling
rg "getData\(" --type dart -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 4827
| @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ class UserImpl extends UserRepository { | |||
| @override | |||
| Future<ProfileResponseModel> loadUserProfile() async { | |||
| String userId = | |||
| await HiveRepository.getData("userId", HiveBoxNames.authBox); | |||
| await HiveRepository.getData("userId", HiveBoxNames.authBox) as String; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid force casting and add null handling
The current implementation might crash if getData returns null. Consider using null-safe operators and adding proper error handling.
Here's a safer implementation:
- String userId =
- await HiveRepository.getData("userId", HiveBoxNames.authBox) as String;
+ final userId = await HiveRepository.getData("userId", HiveBoxNames.authBox);
+ if (userId == null) {
+ throw Exception('User ID not found in storage');
+ }| String token = | ||
| (await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox))!; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using null assertion operator for token retrieval
The current implementation assumes the token will never be null, which could lead to runtime exceptions. Consider handling the null case explicitly for better error handling.
Here's a safer approach:
- String token =
- (await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox))!;
+ final token = await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox);
+ if (token == null) {
+ throw Exception('Authentication token not found');
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| String token = | |
| (await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox))!; | |
| final token = await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox); | |
| if (token == null) { | |
| throw Exception('Authentication token not found'); | |
| } |
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart
Outdated
| // Check if token exists and is not null | ||
| final token = snapshot.data; | ||
| if (token == null || token.isEmpty) { | ||
| logInfo( | ||
| 'No authentication token found. Navigating to WelcomeScreen'); | ||
| return WelcomeScreen(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logInfo('Authentication token found. Navigating to NavPage'); | ||
| return NavPage(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance token validation logic
The current implementation only checks if the token is null or empty. Consider adding token format validation and expiration check.
Suggested enhancement:
- final token = snapshot.data;
- if (token == null || token.isEmpty) {
+ final token = snapshot.data;
+ if (!isValidToken(token)) {
logInfo('No authentication token found. Navigating to WelcomeScreen');
return WelcomeScreen();
} else {Add this helper method:
bool isValidToken(String? token) {
if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false;
try {
// Add JWT validation if using JWT tokens
return true;
} catch (e) {
logError('Token validation failed', e);
return false;
}
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- thanks @Mozart299 please review all the AI Bot review comments and pick address any that appear interesting. When full done with everything, please let me know so that I can merge.
- Please note that you need to fully test out all the AI suggestions since some of them are sometimes not accurate.
…en validation; enhance user profile loading and repository token management
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (1)
Line range hint
77-98: Add Bearer prefix and reduce code duplicationThere are two issues here:
- Missing "Bearer" prefix in Authorization header (security concern)
- Duplicate code with createGetRequest method
Consider refactoring to use createGetRequest:
Future<Response> createAuthenticatedGetRequest( String path, Map<String, String> queryParams) async { String? token = await _getToken(); if (token == null) { throw Exception('Authentication token not found'); } - - print(token); - - String url = ApiUtils.baseUrl + path; - - Response response = await http - .get(Uri.parse(url).replace(queryParameters: queryParams), headers: { - "Accept": "*/*", - "Authorization": "${token}", - "Content-Type": "application/json", - }); - - if (response.statusCode != 200) { - throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body)['message']); - } - - return response; + return createGetRequest(path, queryParams); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (2)
8-15: Consider adding cache invalidation mechanismThe token caching implementation is good for performance, but it needs a way to invalidate the cache when the token expires or is updated.
Consider adding a method to clear the cache:
+ void clearTokenCache() { + _cachedToken = null; + }
Line range hint
19-43: Enhance error handling structureThe error handling is improved but could benefit from a more structured approach using custom exceptions.
Consider creating a dedicated exception class:
class ApiException implements Exception { final String message; final int statusCode; ApiException(this.message, this.statusCode); @override String toString() => 'ApiException: $message (Status: $statusCode)'; }Then update the error handling:
- throw new Exception(errorMessage); + throw ApiException(errorMessage, response.statusCode);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart(3 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/auth/pages/login_page.dart(5 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/profile/repository/user_repository.dart(1 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- mobile-v3/lib/src/app/profile/repository/user_repository.dart
- mobile-v3/lib/src/app/auth/pages/login_page.dart
🔇 Additional comments (5)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (1)
12-12: Verify token sanitization in HiveRepository
Let's ensure the token is properly sanitized when stored and retrieved.
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart (4)
36-36: LGTM: Proper initialization of Hive storage
The Hive initialization is correctly placed and wrapped in appropriate error handling.
165-169: LGTM: Well-implemented loading state
The loading indicator provides clear feedback during authentication state retrieval.
171-190: Enhanced error handling implementation
The error handling has been improved with:
- User-friendly error message
- Retry functionality
- Proper error logging
225-234: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing JWT validation
The token validation helper is a good start, but the JWT validation is currently a placeholder. Consider implementing proper JWT validation to enhance security.
Here's a suggested implementation:
bool isValidToken(String? token) {
if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false;
try {
- // Add JWT validation if using JWT tokens
+ final parts = token.split('.');
+ if (parts.length != 3) return false;
+
+ // Validate token structure
+ if (!_isBase64(parts[0]) || !_isBase64(parts[1])) return false;
+
+ // TODO: Add signature verification if needed
+
return true;
} catch (e) {
logError('Token validation failed', e, StackTrace.current);
return false;
}
}
+
+bool _isBase64(String str) {
+ try {
+ return base64Url.decode(str).isNotEmpty;
+ } catch (e) {
+ return false;
+ }
+}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
|
||
| print(response.statusCode); | ||
|
|
||
| if (response.statusCode != 200) { | ||
| throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body)['message']); | ||
| throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Maintain consistent error handling across methods
The error handling here is less robust compared to the post request implementation.
Apply the same error message extraction pattern:
- throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body));
+ final responseBody = json.decode(response.body);
+ final errorMessage = responseBody is Map && responseBody.containsKey('message')
+ ? responseBody['message']
+ : 'An error occurred';
+ throw new Exception(errorMessage);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body)); | |
| final responseBody = json.decode(response.body); | |
| final errorMessage = responseBody is Map && responseBody.containsKey('message') | |
| ? responseBody['message'] | |
| : 'An error occurred'; | |
| throw new Exception(errorMessage); |
| // Check if token exists and is not null | ||
| final token = snapshot.data; | ||
| if (!isValidToken(token)) { | ||
| logInfo( | ||
| 'No authentication token found. Navigating to WelcomeScreen'); | ||
| return WelcomeScreen(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logInfo('Authentication token found. Navigating to NavPage'); | ||
| return NavPage(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Token validation implementation needs improvement
The current token validation is too basic and lacks proper JWT validation as indicated by the commented code. Here are the key issues:
isValidToken()only checks for null/empty values but doesn't validate the token's integrity or expiration- Direct navigation to
NavPage()exists in login_page.dart which could potentially bypass proper token validation - Token storage is implemented but there's no proper validation between storage and usage
Consider:
- Implementing proper JWT token validation including signature and expiration checks
- Adding token refresh mechanism
- Ensuring all routes to NavPage go through proper token validation
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify token validation flow
The token validation logic looks good, but let's verify the integration with the auth system.
Let me gather more information about the token validation implementation.
Let me check the login flow to ensure proper token handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper token usage across the codebase
echo "Checking token validation patterns..."
# Look for token retrieval patterns
rg -l "HiveRepository.getData.*token.*authBox"
# Check for potential token validation bypasses
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($TOKEN == null || $TOKEN.isEmpty)'
# Look for direct NavPage navigation that might bypass token validation
ast-grep --pattern 'return NavPage();'
Length of output: 320
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of isValidToken function
ast-grep --pattern 'isValidToken($TOKEN) {
$$$
}'
# Look for token validation related code with context
rg "isValidToken|token.*validation" -A 3
# Check for other NavPage navigations with context
rg "NavPage\(\)" -A 2
# Examine token retrieval implementation
rg "getData.*token.*authBox" -A 3
Length of output: 1755
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check login implementation and token storage
rg "login.*token" -A 5
# Look for token storage implementation
rg "setData.*token.*authBox" -A 3
# Check for token cleanup/logout
rg "removeData.*token.*authBox|clearToken|logout" -A 3
# Look for any direct NavPage navigation in auth flows
ast-grep --pattern 'onPressed: () {
$$$
NavPage();
$$$
}'
Length of output: 13443
|
@Baalmart you can merge now and i deploy to see if error has been fixed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (1)
Line range hint
82-103: Fix token prefix and standardize error handlingTwo issues need attention:
- The Authorization header is missing the "Bearer" prefix
- Error handling doesn't follow the same robust pattern as other methods
Response response = await http .get(Uri.parse(url).replace(queryParameters: queryParams), headers: { "Accept": "*/*", - "Authorization": "${token}", + "Authorization": "Bearer ${token}", "Content-Type": "application/json", }); if (response.statusCode != 200) { - throw new Exception(json.decode(response.body)['message']); + final responseBody = json.decode(response.body); + final errorMessage = responseBody is Map && responseBody.containsKey('message') + ? responseBody['message'] + : 'An error occurred'; + throw new Exception(errorMessage); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (2)
8-15: Consider adding token validation in _getToken methodWhile caching improves performance, consider adding token validation (e.g., expiration check) before returning the cached token. This would prevent using an expired token for requests.
Future<String?> _getToken() async { if (_cachedToken == null) { _cachedToken = await HiveRepository.getData("token", HiveBoxNames.authBox); } + if (_cachedToken != null && !isTokenValid(_cachedToken!)) { + _cachedToken = null; + return null; + } return _cachedToken; }
54-74: Consider extracting common headers to a separate methodThe headers construction could be made more DRY by extracting common headers into a separate method.
+ Map<String, String> _getCommonHeaders(String? token) { + final headers = { + "Accept": "*/*", + "Content-Type": "application/json", + }; + if (token != null) { + headers["Authorization"] = "Bearer $token"; + } + return headers; + } Future<Response> createGetRequest( String path, Map<String, String> queryParams) async { String? token = await _getToken(); String url = ApiUtils.baseUrl + path; - Map<String, String> headers = { - "Accept": "*/*", - "Content-Type": "application/json", - }; - if (token != null) { - headers["Authorization"] = "Bearer $token"; - } + final headers = _getCommonHeaders(token);mobile-v3/lib/main.dart (1)
162-202: Improved error handling and loading statesThe FutureBuilder implementation now properly handles all states with appropriate user feedback. The loading indicator and error retry mechanism are good additions.
However, consider adding a more descriptive error message that could help with troubleshooting.
- Text('Unable to verify authentication status'), + Text('Unable to verify authentication status: ${snapshot.error?.toString() ?? 'Unknown error'}'),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mobile-v3/pubspec.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart(3 hunks)mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart(2 hunks)mobile-v3/pubspec.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
mobile-v3/lib/src/app/shared/repository/base_repository.dart (1)
Line range hint 19-43: LGTM! Robust error handling implementation
The changes implement proper token validation and structured error handling. The Bearer prefix is correctly added, and the error message extraction is well-implemented.
mobile-v3/pubspec.yaml (1)
58-58: Verify jwt_decoder version for security patches
The jwt_decoder package is correctly added with a caret version constraint. However, let's ensure we're using the most secure version.
✅ Verification successful
jwt_decoder version 2.0.1 is secure and up-to-date
The specified version ^2.0.1 is actually the latest available version, and the package shows strong health indicators:
- Latest version: 2.0.1 (you're using the most recent release)
- High popularity score: 0.99
- Dart 3 compatible and null-safe
- No known security vulnerabilities
- Active usage with 628k+ downloads in the last 30 days
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version and security advisories for jwt_decoder
echo "Checking latest version..."
curl -s https://pub.dev/packages/jwt_decoder.json | jq -r '.latest.version'
echo "Checking for known vulnerabilities..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PUB, package: "jwt_decoder") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
Length of output: 518
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try an alternative approach to check the package version
# Check if jwt_decoder is used in the codebase and its version from pub.dev
echo "Checking jwt_decoder usage..."
rg "jwt_decoder" -l
echo "Checking version from pub.dev API..."
curl -s "https://pub.dev/api/packages/jwt_decoder" | jq -r '.versions[] | .version' | sort -V
# Also check the package score and popularity
echo "Checking package metrics..."
curl -s "https://pub.dev/api/packages/jwt_decoder/metrics" | jq -r '.score'
Length of output: 1098
mobile-v3/lib/main.dart (1)
193-201: Verify token cleanup on expiration
When a token is invalid or expired, ensure it's properly cleaned up from storage.
✅ Verification successful
Token cleanup is properly handled on invalidation
Based on the codebase analysis, the token validation and cleanup process is well-implemented:
-
Token validation is properly handled in
isValidToken()which checks for:- Null or empty tokens
- Token expiration using
JwtDecoder.isExpired()
-
Token cleanup is managed through:
- Token storage in
HiveRepositorywith proper box isolation (authBox) - Automatic redirection to
WelcomeScreenwhen token is invalid - Token validation before each authenticated request in
BaseRepository
- Token storage in
The current implementation follows security best practices by:
- Validating tokens before use
- Redirecting to authentication when tokens are invalid
- Using secure storage (
HiveRepository) for token management
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for token cleanup implementation
echo "Checking token cleanup patterns..."
# Look for token removal on expiration/invalidation
rg "removeData.*token.*authBox|clearToken|logout" -A 3
# Check for token cleanup in auth flows
ast-grep --pattern 'if (!isValidToken($TOKEN)) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 13455
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for token validation and cleanup implementations
echo "Checking token validation and cleanup patterns..."
# Look for token validation implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'isValidToken($TOKEN) {
$$$
}'
# Check for token storage and cleanup in auth-related files
rg "HiveRepository|authBox|token" -g "*.dart" -A 3
# Look for auth state management
rg "auth.*state|token.*state" -g "*.dart" -A 3
Length of output: 21400
| bool isValidToken(String? token) { | ||
| if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false; | ||
| try { | ||
| if (JwtDecoder.isExpired(token)) { | ||
| logInfo('Token has expired'); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| return true; | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| logError('Token validation failed', e, StackTrace.current); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance JWT validation checks
While the current implementation handles expiration and basic validation, consider adding more comprehensive JWT checks.
bool isValidToken(String? token) {
if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false;
try {
+ final Map<String, dynamic> decodedToken = JwtDecoder.decode(token);
+
+ // Validate required claims
+ if (!decodedToken.containsKey('sub') || !decodedToken.containsKey('iat')) {
+ logInfo('Token missing required claims');
+ return false;
+ }
+
if (JwtDecoder.isExpired(token)) {
logInfo('Token has expired');
return false;
}
+
+ // Check if token is not used before its issuance
+ final iat = DateTime.fromMillisecondsSinceEpoch(decodedToken['iat'] * 1000);
+ if (iat.isAfter(DateTime.now())) {
+ logInfo('Token used before issuance');
+ return false;
+ }
+
return true;
} catch (e) {
logError('Token validation failed', e, StackTrace.current);
return false;
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| bool isValidToken(String? token) { | |
| if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false; | |
| try { | |
| if (JwtDecoder.isExpired(token)) { | |
| logInfo('Token has expired'); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| logError('Token validation failed', e, StackTrace.current); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| bool isValidToken(String? token) { | |
| if (token == null || token.isEmpty) return false; | |
| try { | |
| final Map<String, dynamic> decodedToken = JwtDecoder.decode(token); | |
| // Validate required claims | |
| if (!decodedToken.containsKey('sub') || !decodedToken.containsKey('iat')) { | |
| logInfo('Token missing required claims'); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| if (JwtDecoder.isExpired(token)) { | |
| logInfo('Token has expired'); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| // Check if token is not used before its issuance | |
| final iat = DateTime.fromMillisecondsSinceEpoch(decodedToken['iat'] * 1000); | |
| if (iat.isAfter(DateTime.now())) { | |
| logInfo('Token used before issuance'); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } catch (e) { | |
| logError('Token validation failed', e, StackTrace.current); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } |
…g; improve Hive data retrieval safety
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
How should this be manually tested?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores