-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Website: Addressing Feedback #2385
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a subtle modification to the Changes
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Possibly Related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
website2/src/views/solutions/research/data-access.tsx (2)
41-41
: Layout changes look good, but consider viewport consistency.The reduction in maximum width (7xl to 5xl) and padding adjustments improve content readability by creating a more focused layout. However, removing padding completely on larger screens (
lg:px-0
) might create edge-to-edge content that feels disconnected from the rest of the UI.Consider maintaining minimal padding on larger screens:
- <section className="max-w-5xl mx-auto px-4 lg:px-0"> + <section className="max-w-5xl mx-auto px-4 lg:px-4">
Line range hint
41-124
: Consider performance and accessibility improvements.The component is well-structured, but there are a few opportunities for optimization:
- The image dimensions aren't specified, which could cause layout shifts
- The blob overlay image could benefit from lazy loading since it's decorative
- The text contrast ratio should be verified for accessibility
Consider these improvements:
<Image src={CONTENT.images.consultation[0] || '/placeholder.svg'} alt="Air Quality Monitoring Equipment" fill + width={800} + height={600} className="object-cover hover:scale-105 transition-transform duration-300" priority /> <Image src={CONTENT.images.blob || '/placeholder.svg'} alt="Blob Overlay" fill + loading="lazy" + aria-hidden="true" className="object-contain opacity-50" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
website2/src/views/solutions/research/data-access.tsx
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build-push-website2-deploy-preview
🔇 Additional comments (1)
website2/src/views/solutions/research/data-access.tsx (1)
Line range hint
41-124
: Great use of animations and responsive design! 🎉The implementation shows thoughtful consideration for user experience:
- Smooth animations with Framer Motion
- Responsive grid layout
- Progressive enhancement with decorative elements
- Proper image optimization with Next.js Image
New Website2 changes available for preview here |
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Status of maturity (all need to be checked before merging):
Screenshots (optional)
Summary by CodeRabbit