Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Tapioca to 0.16.9, and gem version to 0.0.17 #4

Merged

Conversation

franklinhu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I wanted to test out this gem, but we're using a newer version of Tapioca in our repo.

Changes

  • Upgrade tapioca to 0.16.9.
  • Changed the tapioca version requirement to ~> from <=. Not sure if you intended <= but seemed odd to require only older versions and not newer ones. ~> strikes a nice balance since it'll match all patch versions so you should need to bump it less frequently
  • bump the version of this gem to 0.0.17 to reflect the Tapioca change

Let me know if there's anything else I can fix up!

@franklinhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stathis-alexander wondering if you could take a look? Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@stathis-alexander stathis-alexander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @franklinhu , thanks for contributing. Sorry to have missed your pull request!

boba.gemspec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@stathis-alexander
Copy link
Collaborator

stathis-alexander commented Feb 7, 2025

Let me quickly review the Tapioca changes and see if anything needs changing. I don't think there should be. I specifically skipped 0.16.8 because they introduce a bug.

@stathis-alexander stathis-alexander merged commit 2059410 into angellist:main Feb 7, 2025
1 check failed
@stathis-alexander
Copy link
Collaborator

@franklinhu - I've merged this and added a new release to gemfury. Let me know if you encounter any issues.

@franklinhu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great thanks for the quick turn around!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants