Support alertmanager Grafana datasource

[jgosmann]

SUMMARY

This adds the "alertmanager" datasource. Apparently added in Grafana 9.2.

ISSUE TYPE

• Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

grafana_datasource plugin

[rrey]

Hi @jgosmann,

Please add integration tests and a changelog fragment to ha e CI pass.

thx 🙏🏻 !

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #287 (cef4115) into main (324fcf7) will increase coverage by 3.49%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head cef4115 differs from pull request most recent head 9f8a264. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9f8a264 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #287      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.31%   73.80%   +3.49%     
==========================================
  Files          17       13       -4     
  Lines        1772     1596     -176     
  Branches      294      275      -19     
==========================================
- Hits         1246     1178      -68     
+ Misses        389      281     -108     
  Partials      137      137              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	68.36% <0.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️
sanity	?
units	65.69% <0.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
plugins/modules/grafana_datasource.py	75.13% <0.00%> (-0.81%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/grafana_plugin.py	25.47% <0.00%> (-2.84%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/grafana_organization.py	83.33% <0.00%> (-1.18%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/grafana_folder.py	74.74% <0.00%> (-1.02%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/grafana_notification_channel.py	57.07% <0.00%> (-0.49%)	⬇️
plugins/modules/grafana_dashboard.py	51.76% <0.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️
plugins/lookup/grafana_dashboard.py
plugins/doc_fragments/basic_auth.py
plugins/doc_fragments/api_key.py
plugins/callback/grafana_annotations.py

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[BenjaminSchubert]

Hey, I'd be interested in being able to do this too. I see the tests were added but the PR has become stale. Is there any hope of resurrecting this PR @jgosmann or one of the maintainers? Or would it be best to create a new one?

[jgosmann]

I don't think there's anything I can do at the moment. Still waiting for a review. 😅

[BenjaminSchubert]

(Not a maintainer, mainly trying to help :) )

The code seems consistent with the other implementations of data sources, I also tried it locally and it did work as I expected. There are conflicts that will need rebasing though

[Nemental]

Hey @jgosmann,
I've resolved the conflicts and made a few other small changes.
Tomorrow I'll do the final review and take a look over the tests, it's just too late for that now.
Many thanks for the PR and your contribution!

[Nemental]

lgtm! thanks @jgosmann