This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 12, 2021. It is now read-only.
add attribute label support #102
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks, I'll take a look at this later. |
michaek
added a commit
to michaek/validate.js
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2016
|
This seems to be an improvement on overriding the prettify function in the sense that it's scoped to the options argument of a |
|
please resolve this conflict. I need this feature |
|
@ansman any update on this? Would be a nice feature |
|
@uiii Whst is the status? |
|
@mindaugasnakrosis This is quite old, read the description, I think it explains it enough. I don't use this library anymore. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I've implemented support for attribute label, which when used is printed in the error messages instead of "pretiffied" attribute name (see #69 (comment)). I have updated tests, but maybe didn't cover the code completely. I didn't updated doc. Finally I've used another validation library, so I don't rely on this anymore, but I don't want throw away the work. If you found my implementation useful, here it is, if not, just delete the PR.