Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: deploy program on last slot of epoch during environment change #101
Fix: deploy program on last slot of epoch during environment change #101
Changes from all commits
17f94d7
bf97ccd
2db2892
e438f8d
edc773e
0744297
2796df2
04768d0
6b09337
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This works, but I think
>
instead of!=
would make the logic clearer (although I know that in other places we use !=, so feel free to leave != if you prefer to be consistent)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to leave it as is for now. I am not 100% sure why we have
!=
check in the other function. Just want to make sure we don't oversee some actual condition.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I chose
==
and!=
over<=
and>
to avoid off-by-one-errors such as writing<
instead of<=
. That is all, don't see a semantic reason why we need to stick with==
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here, I'd prefer
<=
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer to leave it as is for now. I am not 100% sure why we have
!=
check in the other function. Just want to make sure we don't oversee some actual condition.