Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ledger-tool: Make blockstore slot functional with no tx metadata #2423
ledger-tool: Make blockstore slot functional with no tx metadata #2423
Changes from all commits
040235b
db127c1
e386ed0
8f93850
a28bcca
99b1206
fb3dced
cf2824d
7fc89e0
dd24383
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are there any ramifications of removing this error mapping? I guess only if/when we add transaction version 1 and don't update the Options here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so;
LedgerToolError
has a corresponding variantagave/ledger-tool/src/error.rs
Lines 13 to 14 in 0880cb6
and the underlying error type displays essentially the same information with different wording:
agave/transaction-status/src/lib.rs
Lines 58 to 62 in 0880cb6
I think the mapping even being there in the first place was an oversight on my end in #1255
That sounds right, altho we'd hit the error regardless of how we map and bubble the error up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With moving the print of slot into
output_slot()
, this became redundant