Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add typo ci check and fix typos #4375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024
Merged

ci: add typo ci check and fix typos #4375

merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2024

Conversation

hezhangjian
Copy link
Member

@hezhangjian hezhangjian commented May 18, 2024

Motivation

Introduce typos ci to avoid typos. See https://lists.apache.org/thread/04hqqcnkfc5189zsxj0s5wm37t2x7bky

@hezhangjian hezhangjian force-pushed the typo-check branch 4 times, most recently from 166328d to 1bff8a6 Compare May 23, 2024 06:09
@hezhangjian hezhangjian changed the title [WIP] ci: add typo ci check and fix typos ci: add typo ci check and fix typos May 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: ZhangJian He <[email protected]>
@hezhangjian
Copy link
Member Author

OWASP Dependency Check failure because I modifiy the tyops in OWASP suppressions xml. Didn't modify any dependency in this PR.

Copy link
Member

@StevenLuMT StevenLuMT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great,LGTM

@hezhangjian hezhangjian added this to the 4.18.0 milestone May 25, 2024
@hezhangjian hezhangjian self-assigned this May 25, 2024
@hezhangjian
Copy link
Member Author

@hezhangjian hezhangjian merged commit 2eb70b1 into master May 26, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@hezhangjian hezhangjian deleted the typo-check branch May 26, 2024 03:23
@lhotari
Copy link
Member

lhotari commented Jun 12, 2024

This broke. PR to fix it #4433.

@shoothzj Please notice that in the future, we shouldn't be adding any external actions to run in apache/bookkeeper repository context because of security reasons. It's only fine for pull_request builds since they don't have access to the repository. More details in https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions#using-third-party-actions .

@hezhangjian
Copy link
Member Author

@lhotari Thanks for the heads-up and the link to the security practices! I'll make sure to adjust the approach accordingly for future contributions.

Ghatage pushed a commit to sijie/bookkeeper that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants