Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[opt](paimon)Optimize the storage location of the serialized paimon table for 3.0 (#44274) #44664

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

[opt](paimon)Optimize the storage location of the serialized paimon table for 3.0 (#44274) #44664

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

wuwenchi
Copy link
Contributor

@wuwenchi wuwenchi commented Nov 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

bp: #44274

@wuwenchi
[opt](paimon)Optimize the storage location of the serialized paimon t…
f203f03 
…able (apache#44274)

Related PR: apache#43167

Previously, the serialized paimon table was placed in `TPaimonFileDesc`,
which resulted in each split storing a serialized paimon table. It will
wasted a lot of space if a table has lots of split.
Now change the storage location of the serialized paimon table so that
all splits of a table can share the data.
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@wuwenchi
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@morningman morningman merged commit fbc103a into apache:branch-3.0 Nov 27, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@wuwenchi @doris-robot @morningman