Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REST: Avoid deprecated execute without HttpClientResponseHandler #11870

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ebyhr
Copy link
Contributor

@ebyhr ebyhr commented Dec 24, 2024

https://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-5.4.x/current/apidocs/org/apache/hc/client5/http/classic/HttpClient.html#execute-org.apache.hc.core5.http.ClassicHttpRequest-

Deprecated. It is strongly recommended to use execute methods with HttpClientResponseHandler such as execute(ClassicHttpRequest, HttpClientResponseHandler) in order to ensure automatic resource deallocation by the client. For special cases one can still use executeOpen(HttpHost, ClassicHttpRequest, HttpContext) to keep the response object open after the request execution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the core label Dec 24, 2024
try {
return httpClient.execute(
request,
response -> {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change in general makes sense to me. Just a minor question: Do you think it would make sense to move this logic into a ResponseHandler member of this class? Seems a bit long to me to include it here as a lambda, and we'd save some indentation too if it was a separate member.

response.getCode(),
responseType.getSimpleName());
}
try {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The other execute() function we called throws IOException while this one can additionally throw ClientProtocolException. Not sure if we have to catch it here or not, though, just wanted to raise attention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants