[format] Unify name from target to destination #588
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
acezen
pushed a commit
to Elssky/incubator-graphar
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2024
Elssky
pushed a commit
to Elssky/incubator-graphar
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
Elssky
pushed a commit
to Elssky/incubator-graphar
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reason for this PR
close #587
notice that there are still a lots of
targetin scala code(or documentation), maybe we should unify them too, or remain them?What changes are included in this PR?
rename
targettodestinationfor AdjListType in proto and concepts.Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?
No, cause protobuf is still under development.