getifaddrs support returning multiple IPv6 addresses

[Meissi-jian]

Summary

getifaddrs support returning multiple IPv6 addresses

Impact

getifaddrs

Testing

Tested on vela product

[nuttxpr]

[Experimental Bot, please feedback here]

No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements. While it provides a summary of the change, it lacks crucial details required for proper review.

Here's a breakdown of what's missing:

• Insufficient Summary: While the summary mentions the change (getifaddrs supporting multiple IPv6 addresses), it lacks the why, how, and related issue references. Why was this change necessary? What part of the code was modified to achieve this? Are there any related NuttX issues?

• Incomplete Impact Assessment: Simply stating "getifaddrs" doesn't explain the impact. While it implies a change to networking, it doesn't specify:

  • New/Changed Feature: Is this a new feature or a modification to an existing one?
  • User Impact: Will users need to change their code to accommodate this change?
  • Build/Hardware/Documentation/Security/Compatibility Impact: All of these are marked as "NO" by omission, which needs explicit confirmation. Even if there's no impact, stating "NO" explicitly is crucial.

• Inadequate Testing Information: "Tested on vela product" is far too vague. The requirements ask for:

  • Build Host Details: OS, CPU architecture, compiler, and version.
  • Target Details: Architecture (simulator, RISC-V, ARM, etc.), board, and configuration.
  • Logs Before and After the Change: Actual log output demonstrating the change's effect and proving that it works as intended. This is essential for verifying the fix.

The PR author needs to provide significantly more detail in all sections to meet the NuttX requirements. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the correctness, impact, and stability of the change.