-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(fe): migrate 6 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL #31819
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Files scanned
File Path | Reviewed |
---|---|
superset-frontend/src/components/ListViewCard/ImageLoader.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ❌ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
superset-frontend/src/dashboard/components/gridComponents/Divider.test.jsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: JUST.in DO IT <[email protected]>
await act(async () => { | ||
render(<ImageLoader {...defaultProps} />); | ||
}); | ||
expect(screen.getByTestId('image-loader')).toBeVisible(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we replace using act
with await screen.findByTestId
? Same applies to other tests in this test suite
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, that's possible. TIL, thanks!
Refactored away in latest HEAD
Signed-off-by: hainenber <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for your contribution!
Thanks! Re:CI, I think the 5th E2E test got borked after merging #31796 |
Probably just a flaky test, rerunning |
I checked e2e CI history. They all failed at 5th shard 🤔 |
chore(fe): migrate 6 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL
SUMMARY
Part of ongoing Enzyme-to-RTL unit test migration. Also add types to a JSX-based unit test.
BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF
N/A
TESTING INSTRUCTIONS
All CIs should pass
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION