Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(fe): migrate 6 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL #31819

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hainenber
Copy link
Contributor

@hainenber hainenber commented Jan 13, 2025

chore(fe): migrate 6 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL

SUMMARY

Part of ongoing Enzyme-to-RTL unit test migration. Also add types to a JSX-based unit test.

BEFORE/AFTER SCREENSHOTS OR ANIMATED GIF

N/A

TESTING INSTRUCTIONS

All CIs should pass

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • Has associated issue:
  • Required feature flags:
  • Changes UI
  • Includes DB Migration (follow approval process in SIP-59)
    • Migration is atomic, supports rollback & is backwards-compatible
    • Confirm DB migration upgrade and downgrade tested
    • Runtime estimates and downtime expectations provided
  • Introduces new feature or API
  • Removes existing feature or API

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
superset-frontend/src/components/ListViewCard/ImageLoader.tsx

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@hainenber hainenber changed the title chore(fe): migrate 3 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL chore(fe): migrate 5 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL Jan 14, 2025
@hainenber hainenber changed the title chore(fe): migrate 5 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL chore(fe): migrate 6 Enzyme-based unit tests to RTL Jan 14, 2025
@geido geido requested a review from rusackas January 15, 2025 11:37
Co-authored-by: JUST.in DO IT <[email protected]>
await act(async () => {
render(<ImageLoader {...defaultProps} />);
});
expect(screen.getByTestId('image-loader')).toBeVisible();
Copy link
Member

@kgabryje kgabryje Jan 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we replace using act with await screen.findByTestId? Same applies to other tests in this test suite

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, that's possible. TIL, thanks!

Refactored away in latest HEAD

Copy link
Member

@kgabryje kgabryje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your contribution!

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

Re:CI, I think the 5th E2E test got borked after merging #31796

@kgabryje
Copy link
Member

Probably just a flaky test, rerunning

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

I checked e2e CI history. They all failed at 5th shard 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants