Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removes old download venues from the monthly downloads page #821

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025
Merged

removes old download venues from the monthly downloads page #821

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
1faa976
removes mentions of mirrors on stats page. Also removed older info re…
Jan 9, 2025
a5285fa
Merge branch 'develop' into ARXIVCE-2998-mirrors-on-stats
jweiskoff Jan 10, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions browse/templates/stats/monthly_downloads.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
<p><strong>Caveats:</strong> While we have attempted to extract download data representing unique full-text downloads by real users, there are many factors which affect accuracy.
These factors include:</p>
<ol>
<li>the data is from the main arXiv site and the arXiv mirrors, though some mirror data is incomplete.</li>
<li>only web downloads are included (and not FTP or email &quot;downloads&quot; that were formerly supported).</li>
<li>the data is from the main arXiv site.</li>
<li>only web downloads are included.</li>
<li>we have counted downloads according to the COUNTER algorithm which excludes rapid repeat downloads.</li>
<li>we have attempted to identify and remove robot or automated downloads from the count (false positives lead to undercounting, failing to identify robots leads to overcounting).</li>
<lidata prior to 2009 has not been cleaned with as much care as later data, but it shows trends nonetheless.</li>
Expand Down
Loading