-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changed timing of pulses #4
Conversation
// Due to inaccurate timing, skipping pulses. Results scrambled screen // (http://arduino.cc/en/Reference/delayMicroseconds)
Can someone move this on from "pending" as it is a needed fix. I had the same problem on my project and luckily found this as the correct solution. |
The reason for the "pending" state is that Arduino now has a policy that all contributors must sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA). @ajvdw can sign the CLA by clicking the "Contributor License Agreement" link in the comment by the @CLAassistant bot above. That will trigger another validation operation by the bot and it should change the state from pending once that check is passing. Arduino also has a policy that one of the developers must review and approve the proposal before it can be accepted. Since this pull request was opened years before the automated CLA checking system was put in place, the lack of a review and approval is the more fundamental reason why this is not merged. However, it is likely that the pull requests without a passing CLA check will not be given priority for review, since they couldn't be merged even with an approving review. @ajvdw or any other interested parties could help out with that by providing more detailed information and definitive references (e.g., official datasheets). Thousands of people have surely used this common library without having such a problem (myself included), otherwise we would have many bug reports about it here and on the forum. Yet I haven't seen them. So what are the specific conditions under which a pulse duration is required that is an order of magnitude longer than the minimum indicated in the comment? |
It looks like there is an alternative proposal at #14 and some related discussion at its original pull request thread. |
Hi. I understand the reasons for a CLA but since I am not @ajvdw I wouldn't be able to advance this request. |
Memory usage change @ ec31f82
Click for full report table
Click for full report CSV
|
// Due to inaccurate timing, skipping pulses. Results scrambled screen
// (http://arduino.cc/en/Reference/delayMicroseconds)