Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enable slack and teams tests in config-service and uns #273

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

refaelm92
Copy link
Contributor

@refaelm92 refaelm92 commented Feb 28, 2024

User description

Signed-off-by: refaelm [email protected]


Type

enhancement


Description

  • Updated the system_test_mapping.json to target actual services instead of dummy ones for slack and teams alert channel tests. This change enables the integration tests to run against the users-notification-service and config-service, enhancing the test coverage and reliability.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
system_test_mapping.json
Update Target Repositories for Slack and Teams Tests         

system_test_mapping.json

  • Updated the target_repositories for tests related to teams and slack
    alert channels from dummy services to actual services
    (users-notification-service and config-service).
  • +4/-4     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 28, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (fb419b0)

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 28, 2024

    PR Review

    (Review updated until commit fb419b0)

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the changes are straightforward and involve updating target repositories in a JSON configuration file. The modifications are clear and limited in scope.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Code feedback:

    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 28, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    enhancement
    Verify and update the list of target repositories to include all relevant services for comprehensive test coverage.

    Ensure that the "target_repositories" list includes all relevant services that need to be
    tested for Teams and Slack alert channels. If any service is missing, it should be added
    to maintain comprehensive test coverage.

    system_test_mapping.json [996-997]

     "target_repositories": [
         "users-notification-service",
    -    "config-service"
    +    "config-service",
    +    "additional-service-if-needed"
     ]
     
    best practice
    Add validation for the "skip_on_environment" field to prevent it from being unintentionally left empty.

    Consider adding a validation mechanism to ensure that the "skip_on_environment" field is
    not left empty unintentionally. This could be a simple check in the CI pipeline or a
    pre-commit hook.

    system_test_mapping.json [1000]

    -"skip_on_environment": ""
    +"skip_on_environment": "dev-environment"
     
    maintainability
    Update the "description" fields to accurately reflect the updated scope of tests.

    Review the "description" fields to ensure they accurately reflect the scope and purpose of
    the tests, especially after adding new target repositories. This helps maintain clarity
    and relevance in test documentation.

    system_test_mapping.json [999]

    -"description": "testing teams alert channels with compliance and vulnerabilities notifications"
    +"description": "Comprehensive testing of Teams and Slack alert channels for compliance and vulnerabilities across all services"
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (fb419b0)

    Copy link

    Persistent review updated to latest commit fb419b0

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Feb 28, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    Suggestions                                                                                                                                                     
    best practice
    Ensure "skip_on_environment" is properly set or removed for clarity.         

    Ensure that the "skip_on_environment" field is not left as an empty string if there are
    specific environments where these tests should not run. If the tests are meant to run in
    all environments, consider removing the "skip_on_environment" field entirely for clarity.

    system_test_mapping.json [1000]

    -"skip_on_environment": ""
    +"skip_on_environment": "production"
     
    possible issue
    Verify the targeted repositories are correct for the tests.                  

    Verify the "target_repositories" list to ensure that the correct repositories are targeted
    for the tests. If "users-notification-service" and "config-service" are the correct
    repositories, no action is needed. However, if the "-dummy" suffix was indicating a test
    or staging version of these services, ensure that the correct production versions are
    being targeted.

    system_test_mapping.json [996-997]

     "target_repositories": [
    -    "users-notification-service",
    -    "config-service"
    +    "users-notification-service-prod",
    +    "config-service-prod"
     ]
     
    enhancement
    Add a "test_type" field to categorize the nature of the tests.               

    Consider adding a "test_type" field to specify whether these tests are integration,
    end-to-end, or another type. This can help in categorizing and filtering tests based on
    their nature and requirements.

    system_test_mapping.json [999]

    +"test_type": "integration",
     "description": "testing teams alert channels with compliance and vulnerabilities notifications"
     
    Add a "schedule" field to automate test execution.                           

    If these tests are meant to be run periodically, consider adding a "schedule" field to
    define the frequency. This can help in automating test execution and ensuring regular
    validation of the alert channels.

    system_test_mapping.json [1010]

    +"schedule": "daily",
     "description": "testing slack alert channels with compliance and vulnerabilities notifications"
     
    maintainability
    Group related tests under a common key for better maintainability.           

    To improve the maintainability of the test configurations, consider grouping related tests
    under a common key. This can help in organizing tests by their purpose or the service they
    target, making it easier to manage and update test configurations.

    system_test_mapping.json [996-997]

    -"target_repositories": [
    -    "users-notification-service",
    -    "config-service"
    -]
    +"alert_channel_tests": {
    +    "target_repositories": [
    +        "users-notification-service",
    +        "config-service"
    +    ]
    +}
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @refaelm92 refaelm92 merged commit dd8451f into master Feb 29, 2024
    3 checks passed
    @Bezbran Bezbran deleted the enable-slack branch May 1, 2024 10:12
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants