You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4, because the PR introduces a significant amount of new functionality, including new API endpoints, comprehensive tests, and utility enhancements. The complexity of the changes, especially around the vulnerability V2 views and the extensive testing logic, requires a thorough review to ensure correctness, performance, and security.
🧪 Relevant tests
Yes
🔍 Possible issues
The assert statement used in tests_scripts/helm/vuln_scan.py might not be suitable for production code as it can be disabled with optimization flags. Consider using explicit error handling.
The use of hard-coded paths and file names (e.g., "configurations/expected-result/V2_VIEWS/wl_filtered.json") in test scripts might reduce flexibility and maintainability.
The method start in VulnerabilityV2Views class is quite long and does multiple things. It might be beneficial to break it down into smaller, more focused methods.
The exception handling in infrastructure/backend_api.py for methods like post_details_request and post_list_request could be more specific to allow better troubleshooting and error reporting.
🔒 Security concerns
No
Code feedback:
relevant file
tests_scripts/helm/vuln_scan.py
suggestion
Consider replacing assert statements with explicit error handling to ensure that critical checks are always enforced, even when Python optimizations are enabled. [important]
Refactor the start method by breaking it down into smaller methods, each responsible for a specific part of the test setup and validation. This will improve code readability and maintainability. [important]
Use more specific exception types instead of the general Exception to provide clearer error information and allow for more granular error handling. [important]
Consider implementing a mechanism to dynamically determine file paths and names, enhancing the flexibility and maintainability of test scripts. [medium]
Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation
When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels
The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:
a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools
The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.
Auto-approve PRs
By invoking:
/review auto_approve
The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.
To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:
[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true
(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)
You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:
[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
-raise Exception('no results for httpd-proxy with exploitable filters (check possible exploitability change)')+raise ValueError('no results for httpd-proxy with exploitable filters (check possible exploitability change)')
Maintainability
Remove unnecessary semicolon.
Remove the semicolon at the end of the line for consistency with Python style.
Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions
Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality
While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
-assert self.backend != None;+assert self.backend is not None;
Avoid storing large lists of URLs in JSON configuration files.
It's recommended to avoid storing large lists of URLs or potentially sensitive information in JSON configuration files. Consider storing such data in a database or a secure external service, and reference it within the application by IDs or keys.
Provide valid values for "architecture" and "os" fields.
For the "architecture" and "os" fields, provide valid values to ensure comprehensive details about the image's environment. Leaving these fields empty might lead to ambiguity in understanding the image's compatibility and requirements.
Expand the "riskFactors" list to include all relevant risks.
The "riskFactors" array currently contains a single item. If there are multiple risk factors associated with the workload, consider expanding this list to include all relevant risks. If this workload truly has only one risk factor, ensure that this is accurately reflected and consider adding more context to the "riskFactors" field to provide deeper insights.
Accurately reflect the presence of relevancy data for the workload.
The "hasRelevancyData" field is set to false. If this workload has associated relevancy data that can impact its risk assessment or management, consider setting this field to true and providing the relevant data. If there is no relevancy data, ensure that this accurately reflects the workload's current state and consider documenting the reason.
Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions
Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.
Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.
Examples for extra instructions:
[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""
Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality
While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands
To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type
enhancement, tests
Description
Changes walkthrough
6 files
vuln_scan_tests.py
Add New Vulnerability V2 Views Test Caseconfigurations/system/tests_cases/vuln_scan_tests.py
vuln_v2_viewsfor vulnerability V2 viewstesting.
vuln_scan.py
Implement Vulnerability V2 Views Testing Logictests_scripts/helm/vuln_scan.py
VulnerabilityV2Viewsfor testing vulnerability V2views.
comparing expected results with actual API responses.
cve_details.json
Add Expected CVE Details JSON for Vulnerability V2 Viewsconfigurations/expected-result/V2_VIEWS/cve_details.json
image_details.json
Add Expected Image Details JSON for Vulnerability V2 Viewsconfigurations/expected-result/V2_VIEWS/image_details.json
views.
wl_details.json
Add Expected Workload Details JSON for Vulnerability V2 Viewsconfigurations/expected-result/V2_VIEWS/wl_details.json
views.
wl_filtered.json
Add Expected Filtered Workload JSON for Vulnerability V2 Viewsconfigurations/expected-result/V2_VIEWS/wl_filtered.json
views.
2 files
backend_api.py
Introduce Vulnerability V2 API Endpoints and Handling Methodsinfrastructure/backend_api.py
images, components, and details.
systests_utilities.py
Enhance Test Utilities with JSON Comparison Capabilitiessystest_utils/systests_utilities.py
DeepDifffor JSON comparison.JSONs.
1 files
readme.md
Document New Vulnerability V2 Views Test Casereadme.md
vuln_v2_viewstest case in the test cases list.1 files
system_test_mapping.json
Add Test Mapping for Vulnerability V2 Views Test Casesystem_test_mapping.json
vuln_v2_viewstest case.