Sub 5260

[RinaO1234]

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests

---

Description

• Added a new test case ac_9_unauthenticated_service to test attack chain 9.
• Updated README to include the new attack chain 9.
• Added new CRD definition for ServiceScanResult in attack chain 9.
• Added configuration files for an unauthenticated service in attack chain 9.
• Documented steps to reproduce attack chain 9.
• Added a script to fix control for attack chain 9.
• Added kind cluster configuration for attack chain 9.
• Defined expected values for attack chain 9.
• Mapped the new test case in system_test_mapping.json.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	2 files ks_microservice_test.py Add test case for unauthenticated service attack chain      configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py Added a new static method ac_9_unauthenticated_service for testing attack chain 9. Configured the test scenario and fix object for the new attack chain. +19/-0    system_test_mapping.json Map new test case for unauthenticated service                        system_test_mapping.json Added mapping for the new test case ac_9_unauthenticated_service. +14/-0
Documentation	2 files README.md Update README to include attack chain 9                                    configurations/scenarios-test-env/README.md Added a reference to the new attack chain 9 in the README. +1/-0      README.md Document steps to reproduce attack chain 9                              configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/README.md Added steps to reproduce attack chain 9 scenario. +27/-0
Enhancement	5 files 01-crd.yaml Define CRD for ServiceScanResult in attack chain 9              configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/01-crd.yaml Added a new CustomResourceDefinition for ServiceScanResult. +43/-0    02-service-unauthnticated.yaml Add unauthenticated service configuration for attack chain 9 configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/02-service-unauthnticated.yaml Added configuration for an unauthenticated service including a ConfigMap, Deployment, Service, and ServiceScanResult. +85/-0    fix_control Add script to fix control for attack chain 9                          configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/fix_control Added a script to delete the ServiceScanResult for the operator in the default namespace. +4/-0      kind-config Add kind cluster configuration for attack chain 9                configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/kind-config Added a kind cluster configuration for attack chain 9. +15/-0    attack-chain-9.json Define expected values for attack chain 9                                configurations/scenarios_expected_values/attack-chain-9.json Added expected values for attack chain 9. +270/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[gitguardian]

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request

GitGuardian id	GitGuardian status	Secret	Commit	Filename
10372901	Triggered	Generic Password	b85acdb	configurations/scenarios-test-env/attack-chain-9/02-service-unauthnticated.yaml	View secret

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider

• following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
• install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

---

^{🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.}

[github-actions]

Preparing PR description...

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 Security concerns Hardcoded Credentials: The deployment configuration for WordPress includes hardcoded database credentials, which could lead to security vulnerabilities if exposed. Consider using Kubernetes secrets to manage sensitive data securely.

⚡ Key issues to review Hardcoded Credentials The file contains hardcoded credentials for a WordPress database, which poses a security risk. Consider using environment variables and secrets management to handle sensitive data securely. Typographical Error The word 'unauthnticated' is misspelled in the header. It should be corrected to 'unauthenticated'.

[github-actions]

Preparing review...

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Correct the data type of fix_object to match its usage in the test configuration The fix_object variable is defined as a list but used as a string. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors. If fix_object is intended to be a list, ensure that the usage in the TestConfiguration reflects this, or adjust the definition to match the intended use. configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [275] -fix_object = ["control", "image"] +fix_object = "control" # or "image" depending on the intended fix Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential bug where fix_object is defined as a list but used as a string, which could lead to unexpected behavior. Correcting this ensures consistency and prevents potential runtime errors.	9
Enhancement	Parameterize the test scenario and fix object to enhance method flexibility The method ac_9_unauthenticated_service is defined as a static method but uses a hardcoded test scenario and fix object. Consider parameterizing these values to increase the flexibility and reusability of the method. configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [283-284] -test_scenario="attack-chain-9", -fix_object="control", +def ac_9_unauthenticated_service(test_scenario="attack-chain-9", fix_object="control"): + ... + return TestConfiguration( + name="ac_9_unauthenticated_service", + test_obj=ScanAttackChainsWithKubescapeHelmChart, + test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start"}], + test_scenario=test_scenario, + fix_object=fix_object, + ) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Parameterizing the test scenario and fix object enhances the flexibility and reusability of the method, making it more adaptable to different test cases without changing the method definition.	8
	Add exception handling to improve the robustness of the test method The method ac_9_unauthenticated_service lacks exception handling which might be necessary given the operations performed, such as applying configurations and scanning. Consider adding try-except blocks to handle potential exceptions and provide more robust error handling. configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [278-284] -return TestConfiguration( - name=inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name, - test_obj=ScanAttackChainsWithKubescapeHelmChart, - test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start"}], - test_scenario="attack-chain-9", - fix_object="control", -) +try: + return TestConfiguration( + name=inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name, + test_obj=ScanAttackChainsWithKubescapeHelmChart, + test_job=[{"trigger_by": "scan_on_start"}], + test_scenario="attack-chain-9", + fix_object="control", + ) +except Exception as e: + print(f"Error during test configuration: {e}") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding exception handling is a good practice to make the code more robust and handle potential runtime errors gracefully. However, it is not critical for the functionality of the method.	7
Maintainability	Replace dynamic method name retrieval with a static name for clarity and reliability The inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name is used to dynamically get the method name. However, this approach is not always reliable and can lead to maintenance issues. Consider replacing it with a static method name string if the dynamic feature is not required. configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [279] -name=inspect.currentframe().f_code.co_name, +name="ac_9_unauthenticated_service", Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While replacing dynamic method name retrieval with a static string can improve code readability and maintainability, it is not a critical issue and depends on the specific use case requirements.	6