Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updating ac tests #449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024
Merged

updating ac tests #449

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2024

Conversation

kooomix
Copy link
Contributor

@kooomix kooomix commented Aug 22, 2024

PR Type

enhancement, documentation


Description

  • Renamed test functions in ks_microservice_test.py to improve clarity and reflect external workload tracking.
  • Updated the README to ensure consistency with the new test function names.
  • Modified system_test_mapping.json to use dummy repository names and align with the renamed test scenarios.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
ks_microservice_test.py
Rename test functions for clarity and consistency               

configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py

  • Renamed several test functions to reflect external workload tracking.
  • Updated function names to improve clarity and consistency.
  • +4/-4     
    system_test_mapping.json
    Update test mapping with new names and dummy repositories

    system_test_mapping.json

  • Updated target repositories to use dummy names.
  • Renamed test scenarios to match updated function names.
  • +15/-15 
    Documentation
    readme.md
    Update README with new test function names                             

    readme.md

  • Updated test function names in the documentation table.
  • Ensured consistency with the new function names.
  • +4/-4     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    @codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2 labels Aug 22, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Key issues to review

    Naming Consistency
    The new function names use 'workload_external_track' consistently, but 'ac_8_external_workload_with_cluster_takeover' doesn't follow this pattern.

    Incomplete Update
    Some target_repositories are updated to use '-dummy' suffix, but others are completely removed. This inconsistency might cause issues.

    Copy link

    Preparing PR description...

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Add column headers to the table in the README file

    The table in the README file appears to be missing column headers. Adding headers
    would improve the clarity and readability of the information presented in the table.

    readme.md [65-68]

    -| `ac_5_fix_control_with_relevancy`                | helm-chart |                                    | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    -| `ac_3_fix_control_no_relevancy`                | helm-chart |                                    | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    -| `ac_3_fix_control_with_relevancy`                | helm-chart |                                    | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    -| `ac_8_external_workload_with_cluster_takeover`                | helm-chart |                                    | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    +| Test Name | Chart Type | Additional Info | Test Environment |
    +|-----------|------------|-----------------|-------------------|
    +| `ac_5_fix_control_with_relevancy` | helm-chart | | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    +| `ac_3_fix_control_no_relevancy` | helm-chart | | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    +| `ac_3_fix_control_with_relevancy` | helm-chart | | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
    +| `ac_8_external_workload_with_cluster_takeover` | helm-chart | | in-cluster kubescape, backend |
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: Adding column headers significantly improves the clarity and readability of the table, making it easier for users to understand the information presented.

    8
    Best practice
    Improve the docstring by breaking it into clear, concise steps

    The docstring for the test method is quite long and contains run-on sentences.
    Consider breaking it down into shorter, more focused sentences for better
    readability and understanding of the test's purpose and steps.

    configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [62-66]

     """
    -install scenario 'alpine' on the cluster, install the kubescape operator and run the scan.
    -once the attack chain has been detected on the backend, fix the attack chain and verify that is has been solved 
    -by triggering a new image scan.
    +Test the attack chain detection and fix process:
    +1. Install 'alpine' scenario on the cluster.
    +2. Install the Kubescape operator and run the scan.
    +3. Detect the attack chain on the backend.
    +4. Fix the attack chain.
    +5. Verify the fix by triggering a new image scan.
     """
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Improving the docstring by breaking it into clear, concise steps enhances readability and understanding, which is beneficial for maintaining the code.

    7
    Use a more descriptive suffix for test repositories in the JSON configuration

    The target repositories are being updated with "-dummy" suffixes. Ensure that this
    change is intentional and consistent across all relevant entries in the JSON file.
    If it's a temporary change for testing purposes, consider using a more descriptive
    suffix or adding a comment to explain the reason for this modification.

    system_test_mapping.json [582-585]

     "target_repositories": [
    -  "cadashboardbe-dummy",
    -  "careportsreceiver-dummy",
    -  "event-ingester-service-dummy",
    -  "gateway-dummy"
    +  "cadashboardbe-test",
    +  "careportsreceiver-test",
    +  "event-ingester-service-test",
    +  "gateway-test"
     ],
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion to use a more descriptive suffix for test repositories is a good practice for clarity, but it is not critical unless the change was unintentional or confusing. The suggestion to add a comment is also helpful for future maintainers.

    5
    Maintainability
    Rename the test method to be more concise and descriptive

    Consider using a more descriptive name for the test method. The current name
    ac_alpine_workload_external_track_fix_image is quite long and doesn't clearly convey
    the purpose of the test. A more concise and descriptive name could improve
    readability and maintainability.

    configurations/system/tests_cases/ks_microservice_test.py [61-66]

     @staticmethod
    -def ac_alpine_workload_external_track_fix_image():
    +def test_alpine_fix_image_scan():
         """
    -    install scenario 'alpine' on the cluster, install the kubescape operator and run the scan.
    -    once the attack chain has been detected on the backend, fix the attack chain and verify that is has been solved 
    -    by triggering a new image scan.
    +    Install Alpine scenario, run Kubescape scan, detect attack chain, fix it, and verify solution with new image scan.
    +    """
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion to rename the test method to a more concise and descriptive name improves readability and maintainability, but it is not crucial for functionality.

    6

    Copy link

    Preparing review...

    @kooomix kooomix merged commit 3b0f773 into master Aug 22, 2024
    3 checks passed
    @matthyx matthyx deleted the update_ac_tests branch August 22, 2024 06:52
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants