Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor cluster state logging to join output lines for better readab… #550

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 1, 2025

Conversation

kooomix
Copy link
Contributor

@kooomix kooomix commented Jan 1, 2025

User description

…ility in BaseK8S class


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Join kubectl output lines for better log readability

  • Enhance cluster state logging in verify_running_pods method


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
base_k8s.py
Improve cluster state logging format                                         

tests_scripts/kubernetes/base_k8s.py

  • Modified cluster state logging by joining output lines into a single
    line
  • Added string manipulation to improve readability of kubectl output
  • +2/-0     

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 Security concerns

    Command Injection:
    The code executes shell commands using subprocess.run() with shell=True, which could be vulnerable to command injection if the namespace or name parameters are user-controlled input. Although this is a test script, it's still a security best practice to avoid shell=True when possible.

    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Error Handling

    The stdout join operation is performed without checking if result.stdout exists or is not None. This could raise an AttributeError if the command fails.

    result = " ".join(result.stdout.splitlines())

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Avoid shell injection vulnerabilities by not using shell=True in subprocess calls

    Using shell=True with subprocess.run can be a security risk as it processes the
    command through a shell - consider using a list of arguments instead.

    tests_scripts/kubernetes/base_k8s.py [770]

    -result = subprocess.run("kubectl get pods -A", timeout=300, shell=True, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
    +result = subprocess.run(["kubectl", "get", "pods", "-A"], timeout=300, shell=False, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: Using shell=True in subprocess calls is a significant security vulnerability that could allow command injection attacks. The suggestion properly addresses this by using a list of arguments instead, which is the secure way to execute commands.

    9
    Possible issue
    Add error handling for subprocess command execution to prevent silent failures

    Add error handling for the subprocess.run command to handle potential command
    execution failures and check result.stderr for error messages.

    tests_scripts/kubernetes/base_k8s.py [770-771]

     result = subprocess.run("kubectl get pods -A", timeout=300, shell=True, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
    +if result.returncode != 0:
    +    Logger.logger.error(f"Failed to get cluster state: {result.stderr}")
    +    raise Exception(f"kubectl command failed with error: {result.stderr}")
     result = " ".join(result.stdout.splitlines())
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion adds crucial error handling for the subprocess command, preventing silent failures and providing clear error messages when kubectl commands fail. This is important for debugging and system reliability.

    8

    Copy link

    github-actions bot commented Jan 1, 2025

    Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

    @kooomix kooomix merged commit bf43de4 into master Jan 1, 2025
    2 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant