You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From a discussion with @mauch: The function seems to be doing calculations that make sense if your uncertainties are in image coordinates, not celestial. The numbers it produces are not correct for celestial coordinates in general. The correct calculation should be much simpler - just take the max of the ra and dec errors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Actually, upon further thought after our discussion - I realised the equivalent calculation would be to take sqrt(ra_err^2 + dec_err^2) since the calc_error_radius function is computing the vertices of a box surrounding the error ellipse rather than the edges.
vast-pipeline/vast_pipeline/image/utils.py
Line 43 in 328e7a5
From a discussion with @mauch: The function seems to be doing calculations that make sense if your uncertainties are in image coordinates, not celestial. The numbers it produces are not correct for celestial coordinates in general. The correct calculation should be much simpler - just take the max of the ra and dec errors
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: