Add the new building DSM class

[nick-harder]

Pull Request

Related Issue

Closes #454

Description

-This add a Building DSM class and combines all residential components into one class by @HafnerMichael.

Changes Proposed

• add building class
• modify DSM naive bidding strategy
• refactor function and move common functions to DSMFlex -add tests for the building class
• some code refactoring
• Building has an attribute is_prosumer
• Refactoring variable names
• Restructuring the process sequence

Testing

[Describe the testing you've done, including any specific test cases or scenarios]

Checklist

Please check all applicable items:

• Code changes are sufficiently documented (docstrings, inline comments, doc folder updates)
• New unit tests added for new features or bug fixes
• Existing tests pass with the changes
• Reinforcement learning examples are operational (for DRL-related changes)
• Code tested with both local and Docker databases
• Code follows project style guidelines and best practices
• Changes are backwards compatible, or deprecation notices added
• New dependencies added to pyproject.toml
• A note for the release notes doc/release_notes.rst of the upcoming release is included
• Consent to release this PR's code under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0

Additional Notes (if applicable)

[Any additional information, concerns, or areas you want reviewers to focus on]

Screenshots (if applicable)

[Add screenshots to demonstrate visual changes]

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.27536% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.71%. Comparing base (15e9585) to head (526b678).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
assume/strategies/naive_strategies.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #480      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.01%   78.71%   +0.69%     
==========================================
  Files          50       51       +1     
  Lines        6938     7027      +89     
==========================================
+ Hits         5413     5531     +118     
+ Misses       1525     1496      -29     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	78.71% <99.27%> (+0.69%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[HafnerMichael]

Looks good to me, thanks!

[nick-harder]

@HafnerMichael there was a small mistake on your branch in the sell_to_market constraints, please compare your working branch with this one to fix the issue since it can affect your results, if you are using that feature

[HafnerMichael]

@HafnerMichael there was a small mistake on your branch in the sell_to_market constraints, please compare your working branch with this one to fix the issue since it can affect your results, if you are using that feature

Ok, no I dont use it there but thanks for the reminder!

[HafnerMichael]

@nick-harder I added a small example (example_01h)

[Manish-Khanra]

@nick-harder The building class is all set to deploy. We just need to fix an issue related to fast_pandas in the test_building. Could you please check if you have an easy and quick fix for the error related to the FastIndex?