Add CI config for github actions

[utkarsharma2]

Description

What is the current behavior?

Currently, we are not running any steps in CI for UTO

closes: #1724

What is the new behavior?

We added the GitHub actions config needed for CI to run Tests

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Nope

Checklist

• Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
• Extended the README / documentation, if necessary

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 93.76% // Head: 45.22% // Decreases project coverage by -48.55% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (f464b13) compared to base (3610312).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    astronomer/astro-sdk#1786       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   93.76%   45.22%   -48.55%     
===========================================
  Files          93       25       -68     
  Lines        4937      973     -3964     
  Branches      486       90      -396     
===========================================
- Hits         4629      440     -4189     
- Misses        219      524      +305     
+ Partials       89        9       -80     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ersal_transfer_operator/data_providers/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sql-cli/sql_cli/settings.py
sql-cli/sql_cli/constants.py
sql-cli/sql_cli/cli/config.py
python-sdk/src/astro/table.py
python-sdk/src/astro/sql/table.py
python-sdk/src/astro/files/types/csv.py
sql-cli/sql_cli/project.py
...dk/src/astro/sql/operators/export_table_to_file.py
python-sdk/src/astro/databases/databricks/delta.py
... and 109 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tatiana]

WDYT of labelling UTO PRs in a similar way to what we do with SQL CLI ones?
https://github.com/astronomer/astro-sdk/blob/main/.github/labeler.yml

[tatiana]

@utkarsharma2, as we discussed, I'm happy for us to have separate tickets/PRs for fixing the following checks:

• Fix type check
• Code coverage

I'm happy for the PR to be merged once Deep Source and the other checks pass.

[utkarsharma2]

@tatiana Added tickets

1. Fix Code-coverage apache-airflow-providers-transfers#13
2. Address TypeCheck #1787