Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

custom_operator_name added to Airflow 2.7 and compatibility added for Airflow 2.9 and 2.10 #110

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

atulya-astronomer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@atulya-astronomer atulya-astronomer linked an issue Nov 7, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 37.14286% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.79%. Comparing base (de68415) to head (9259111).
Report is 110 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tronomer_starship/compat/starship_compatability.py 35.29% 22 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #110      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   41.28%   38.79%   -2.49%     
==========================================
  Files          16       11       -5     
  Lines        1153     1111      -42     
==========================================
- Hits          476      431      -45     
- Misses        677      680       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@atulya-astronomer atulya-astronomer changed the title custom_operator_name added to Airflow 2.7 and backwards compatibility added for Airflow 2.9 and 2.10 custom_operator_name added to Airflow 2.7 and compatibility added for Airflow 2.9 and 2.10 Nov 7, 2024
@atulya-astronomer atulya-astronomer merged commit ee99464 into main Nov 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@atulya-astronomer atulya-astronomer deleted the custom_operator_name branch November 13, 2024 10:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New TI field in 2.8 - custom_operator_name
3 participants