Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coverage ui #10

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

coverage ui #10

merged 20 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

mullr
Copy link
Collaborator

@mullr mullr commented Nov 28, 2023

  • Add hooks for spec coverage display
  • Consistently use Headline Case for Menu Items
  • API rev and some manual HTML templating
  • Flesh out spec UI a bit
  • Remove spurious '.rs' file
  • Update folder metadata on folder/file changes
  • Show/hide spec versions, results
  • Add batch-eval support to conform spec command
  • Further polish on specs panel
  • Fix batch eval
  • Add some more multi-select commands
  • Disable unimplemented menu commands
  • Flesh out spec coverage UI
  • Use api to update spec icon

Copy link
Contributor

@jonlamb-gh jonlamb-gh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The local config path changes need reverted and lints addressed, otherwise LGTM

vscode/src/config.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
if (workspaceState.getShowResults()) {
super.iconPath = new vscode.ThemeIcon("file", new vscode.ThemeColor("symbolIcon.constructorForeground"));
} else {
// TODO color this based on if it has been executed, and if it was successful or not
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added some top-level-stats-icon handling for this on the spec-status branch. I can follow up with that once this lands if it's easier.
https://github.com/auxoncorp/speqtr-support/tree/spec-status

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh man I missed that branch somehow, I'm sorry. I'll pull it in here.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay, rebased those commits on here.

@jonlamb-gh jonlamb-gh merged commit 88ca650 into main Nov 28, 2023
1 check passed
@jonlamb-gh jonlamb-gh deleted the coverage-ui branch November 28, 2023 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants