Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(synthetics): cleanup provisioned lambda and layers for canary #32738

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

badmintoncryer
Copy link
Contributor

Issue # (if applicable)

None

Reason for this change

For the Lambda and Layer used in Canary, the deletion of related resources is handled by a custom resource, but this functionality is now supported natively by CloudFormation.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ja_jp/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-synthetics-canary.html#cfn-synthetics-canary-provisionedresourcecleanup

Description of changes

  • Add provisionedResourceCleanup prop to CanaryProps
  • deprecate cleanup prop which uses custom resource

Describe any new or updated permissions being added

None

Description of how you validated changes

Add both unit and integ test

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team January 4, 2025 14:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added p2 distinguished-contributor [Pilot] contributed 50+ PRs to the CDK labels Jan 4, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.

A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request to a comment.

@badmintoncryer badmintoncryer marked this pull request as draft January 4, 2025 14:26
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation dismissed their stale review January 4, 2025 14:28

✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.52%. Comparing base (ac3ffa5) to head (5d96e01).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32738   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.52%   81.52%           
=======================================
  Files         222      222           
  Lines       13715    13715           
  Branches     2417     2417           
=======================================
  Hits        11181    11181           
  Misses       2254     2254           
  Partials      280      280           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 81.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 80.97% <ø> (ø)
packages/aws-cdk-lib/core 82.09% <ø> (ø)

@badmintoncryer badmintoncryer marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 12:44
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lpizzinidev lpizzinidev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Left comments for minor adjustments

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please update the Deleting underlying resources on canary deletion paragraph with a description of the new attribute?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@badmintoncryer badmintoncryer Jan 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh.. I've forgotten to update the readme. Thanks!

@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ export enum Cleanup {
* Clean up the underlying Lambda function only. The user is
* responsible for cleaning up all other resources left behind
* by the Canary.
*
* @deprecated use provisionedResourceCleanup
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess we should deprecate the cleanup property instead 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've made cleanup deprecated.

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-community-review This PR needs a review from a Trusted Community Member or Core Team Member. label Jan 6, 2025
@badmintoncryer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lpizzinidev Thank you for your review! I've addressed your comments.

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: 5d96e01
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

Copy link
Contributor

@lpizzinidev lpizzinidev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice 👍

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
distinguished-contributor [Pilot] contributed 50+ PRs to the CDK p2 pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants