-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for specifying fault flag when adding error #593
Open
icholy
wants to merge
1
commit into
aws:master
Choose a base branch
from
icholy:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing this function signature will be a breaking / backwards-incompatible change. Ideally, we would want to maintain the current expected behaviour so that this change does not cause any unexpected changes for others as well.
I would recommend setting a default value of
true
for thefault
parameter to ensure that the fault flag is always added by default, and would only be excluded if a third argument with the value offalse
is included.I am also curious, what is the use case for excluding the fault flag? Is there a specific reason why it would not be included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@carolabadeer Here I would like to answer, as I am having the same need as @icholy. In the segments error documentation, is mentioned that the flags
error
,throttle
andfault
, can represent different types of errors.In my personal use case, we are flagging all expected errors as
error
and unexpected errors asfault
.At the moment of catching and handling the error logic, we want to add error data to the segment with
addError
method, but it always setfault
flag totrue
. So we need to overwrite the flag accordingly, whether the error is expected or unexpected.An extra param as @icholy suggest will reduce extra code, and avoid overwriting the segment properties directly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@carolabadeer the change is backwards compatible. The
fault || fault === undefined
condition is semantically equivalent to defaultingfault
totrue
.