chore: Bump Bazel version

[tpasternak]

applied recommendation from here: #7058 (comment)

Checklist

• I have filed an issue about this change and discussed potential changes with the maintainers.
• I have received the approval from the maintainers to make this change.
• This is not a stylistic, refactoring, or cleanup change.

Please note that the maintainers will not be reviewing this change until all checkboxes are ticked. See
the Contributions section in the README for more
details.

Discussion thread for this change

Issue number: <please reference the issue number or url here>

Description of this change

[tpasternak]

@iancha1992 something is wrong with buildkite, could you please take a look?

[mai93]

@tpasternak I retried the failing tests and we may need to check the asserts in some tests:
Log for intellij-plugin-aspect
Log for intellij-ue-plugin

[tpasternak]

thank you @mai93

update:
for jpl:bar_java_proto a JavaRuleOutputJarsProvider$JavaOutput in bazel 8, but not bazel 7

[tpasternak]

In bazel8:

bazel cquery --output=starlark "--starlark:expr=providers(target)['@@rules_java+//java/private:java_info.bzl%JavaInfo'].java_outputs" //aspect/testing/tests/src/com/google/idea/blaze/aspect/proto/jpl:bar_java_proto 

[<unknown object com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.java.JavaRuleOutputJarsProvider$JavaOutput>]

in bazel7:

bazel cquery --output=starlark "--starlark:expr=providers(target)['@@_builtins//:common/java/java_info.bzl%JavaInfo'].java_outputs" //aspect/testing/tests/src/com/google/idea/blaze/aspect/proto/jpl:bar_java_proto 

[]

[tpasternak]

For the context - the failing test is here, and there's an explicit comment about it

intellij/aspect/testing/tests/src/com/google/idea/blaze/aspect/proto/jpl/JavaProtoLibraryTest.java

Lines 46 to 47 in 8581c5f

	// We don't want java_proto_library to be rolling up any jars
	assertThat(jpl.getJavaIdeInfo().getJarsList()).isEmpty();

[tpasternak]

• java_proto_library: difference between bazel7 and bazel8 bazel#24543