Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib dependency version and make it optional #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

koriym
Copy link
Member

@koriym koriym commented Nov 26, 2024

Allow the use of mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib version 4.8 or higher. This change ensures compatibility with the latest versions of the library without breaking existing functionality.

Closes #149

Allow the use of mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib version 4.8 or higher. This change ensures compatibility with the latest versions of the library without breaking existing functionality.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to three files: composer-require-checker.json, composer.json, and src/MobileEtagModule.php. The composer-require-checker.json file has been updated to include the Detection\\MobileDetect symbol in the whitelist. In composer.json, the mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib dependency has been removed from the require section and updated in the require-dev section to allow a broader version range. Additionally, the MobileEtagModule class has been modified to check for the existence of the MobileDetect class, throwing a LogicException if it is not found.

Changes

File Change Summary
composer-require-checker.json Added "Detection\\MobileDetect" to symbol-whitelist array.
composer.json Removed "mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib": "^3.74" from require; updated to `"^3.74
src/MobileEtagModule.php Added a check for MobileDetect class in configure method; throws LogicException if not found.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update symfony/process dependency to include ^7.1. #147: The changes in composer.json regarding the mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib dependency are related to the main PR, as both involve modifications to the same dependency, which is relevant to the MobileDetect class referenced in the main PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@koriym
Copy link
Member Author

koriym commented Nov 26, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/MobileEtagModule.php (1)

28-30: Enhance the error message with installation instructions

While the error handling is correct, the error message could be more helpful by including the composer command.

Consider updating the error message:

-            throw new LogicException('Install mobile-detect/mobiledetectlib'); // @codeCoverageIgnore
+            throw new LogicException('Mobile detection feature requires mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib. Install it with "composer require mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib"'); // @codeCoverageIgnore
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ceeb86 and db655c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • composer-require-checker.json (1 hunks)
  • composer.json (1 hunks)
  • src/MobileEtagModule.php (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
composer-require-checker.json (2)

8-8: LGTM! The whitelist addition is necessary for optional dependency.

The addition of "Detection\MobileDetect" to the symbol whitelist is correct and necessary since the mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib package is being made optional (moved to require-dev). This prevents composer-require-checker from raising errors about the optional dependency.


8-8: Verify the MobileDetect class namespace.

Let's verify that the whitelisted namespace matches the actual class namespace used in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

The namespace Detection\MobileDetect is correctly whitelisted

The verification confirms that the namespace Detection\MobileDetect in composer-require-checker.json matches the actual usage in the codebase. This namespace is consistently used across multiple files:

  • tests/Fake/FakeMobileEtagSetter.php
  • src/MobileEtagModule.php
  • src/MobileEtagSetter.php
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the MobileDetect class namespace usage in the codebase

# Search for MobileDetect class usage
echo "Searching for MobileDetect class usage patterns..."
rg -l "(?:use\s+Detection\\MobileDetect|Detection\\MobileDetect)"

# Search for any other potential MobileDetect namespace patterns
echo "Checking for any other MobileDetect namespace patterns..."
rg -l "MobileDetect" | grep -v "composer-require-checker.json"

Length of output: 588


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual namespace usage in the identified files
echo "=== Content of tests/Fake/FakeMobileEtagSetter.php ==="
cat tests/Fake/FakeMobileEtagSetter.php

echo -e "\n=== Content of src/MobileEtagModule.php ==="
cat src/MobileEtagModule.php

echo -e "\n=== Content of src/MobileEtagSetter.php ==="
cat src/MobileEtagSetter.php

Length of output: 2944

src/MobileEtagModule.php (2)

7-8: LGTM: Imports are properly organized

The new imports are correctly added and follow PSR-12 standards with classes grouped before functions.

Also applies to: 12-13


28-31: Verify MobileDetect usage across the codebase

Let's ensure this runtime check covers all usage points of the MobileDetect class.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about how MobileDetect is used in these files.


Runtime check for MobileDetect is appropriately placed

The runtime check in MobileEtagModule is correctly positioned as:

  • MobileDetect is used in both MobileEtagSetter and its test fake implementation
  • The usage is consistent across both files:
    • Instantiated via new MobileDetect()
    • Used for device detection through isMobile() and isTablet()
  • The module is the right place for the check since it's responsible for binding MobileEtagSetter which depends on MobileDetect
  • No other unexpected usages of MobileDetect were found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify MobileDetect usage across the codebase

# Find all references to MobileDetect class
echo "Searching for MobileDetect class usage..."
rg -l "MobileDetect" --type php

# Find specific usage patterns
echo -e "\nSearching for class instantiation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'new MobileDetect'

echo -e "\nSearching for type hints..."
ast-grep --pattern '$_: MobileDetect'

Length of output: 450


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual usage context in each file
echo "=== MobileEtagSetter.php content ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "MobileDetect" src/MobileEtagSetter.php

echo -e "\n=== MobileEtagModule.php content ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "MobileDetect" src/MobileEtagModule.php

echo -e "\n=== FakeMobileEtagSetter.php content ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "MobileDetect" tests/Fake/FakeMobileEtagSetter.php

# Look for use statements
echo -e "\n=== Use statements for MobileDetect ==="
rg "use.*MobileDetect" --type php

Length of output: 2212

composer.json (2)

30-30: Verify the impact of making mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib optional

The dependency has been moved from require to require-dev and supports both v3.74+ and v4.8+. While this change aligns with making the dependency optional, we should ensure that:

  1. All production code properly handles the case when MobileDetect is not available
  2. The changes in MobileEtagModule.php adequately handle the optional dependency

30-30: Verify compatibility between v3 and v4 of mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib

The version constraint allows both v3.74+ and v4.8+. We should verify:

  1. Breaking changes between v3 and v4
  2. Any necessary code adjustments to support both versions
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more specific information about the breaking changes between v3 and v4 by checking the repository's documentation and changelog.


Let me check one more thing to verify the namespace and class usage compatibility between versions.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

The usage of mobiledetect/mobiledetectlib v3.74+ || v4.8+ is compatible with the codebase

The codebase consistently uses:

  • The modern namespace Detection\MobileDetect
  • Only stable methods isMobile() and isTablet()
  • The package is only required in dev dependencies
  • The implementation in MobileEtagSetter and FakeMobileEtagSetter is straightforward and compatible with both versions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in usage

# Get the changelog or release notes
echo "Fetching release information..."
gh api repos/serbanghita/Mobile-Detect/releases | jq -r '.[].body' | grep -i "break"

# Check for version-specific code
echo "Checking for version-specific code..."
rg "MobileDetect" -B 2 -A 2 --type php

Length of output: 2096


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check composer.json for any version-specific configuration
cat composer.json

# Check the repository's documentation for version differences
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serbanghita/Mobile-Detect/4.8.x/README.md | grep -A 10 -B 10 "4.0"

# Look for any version-specific method calls in the codebase
rg "isTablet|isMobile" --type php -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 4004


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any use statements and class references to verify namespace compatibility
rg "Detection\\\\MobileDetect|Mobile_Detect" --type php

# Check composer autoload configuration in the package
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serbanghita/Mobile-Detect/3.74.0/composer.json | jq .autoload
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/serbanghita/Mobile-Detect/4.8.0/composer.json | jq .autoload

Length of output: 595

@koriym koriym merged commit 6ad2c5d into 1.x Nov 26, 2024
19 checks passed
@koriym koriym deleted the mobile-detect branch November 26, 2024 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant