-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update gfainject to 0.1.1 #52099
Update gfainject to 0.1.1 #52099
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves updates to the Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
recipes/gfainject/patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch (1)
9-12
: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment.The patch correctly adds the missing
Option<u64>
argument. However, the comment could be more descriptive about the purpose of this parameter.- None // Add the missing Option<u64> argument + None // Max memory limit for sorting (None means unlimited)recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-48
: Overall: Changes blocked by missing patch fileThe version update and build requirement changes look good, but this PR is blocked by the missing patch file
patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch
. This needs to be addressed before the PR can be merged.Please:
- Create and add the patch file
- Update this PR with the patch file
- Consider documenting the reason for the patch in the recipe (e.g., link to upstream issue/PR)
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml
(2 hunks)recipes/gfainject/patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/gfainject/patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch (1)
5-12
: Verify the function signature in the codebase.
Let's confirm that this matches the expected function signature.
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml (3)
1-2
: LGTM: Version update matches PR objectives
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
23-27
: Verify necessity of all new build requirements
The added build requirements look appropriate, particularly for zlib-ng compilation. However, let's verify if all are necessary.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check build system and dependency requirements in the source code
echo "Checking for CMake build system..."
fd -e CMakeLists.txt
echo "Checking for pkg-config dependencies..."
fd -e pc
echo "Checking for C/C++ source files..."
fd -e c -e cpp -e cc -e h -e hpp
9-11
: Verify SHA256 checksum for the new version
Let's verify that the SHA256 checksum matches the source tarball.
recipes/gfainject/meta.yaml
Outdated
patches: | ||
- patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch # We'll create this patch | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Missing patch file referenced in meta.yaml
The recipe references a patch file patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch
that hasn't been created yet. This will cause the build to fail.
Please ensure that:
- The patch file is created and added to the repository
- The patch correctly fixes the
convert_bam_to_gbam
function by adding the missingOption<u64>
argument
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've uploaded the patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch
file. Why do you say it has not been created yet?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndreaGuarracino, I apologize for the confusion earlier. I can now confirm that patches/fix-sort-bam-args.patch
exists in the repository. Thank you for adding it. The build should proceed correctly now.
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the patch file 'fix-sort-bam-args.patch' in the repository
fd 'fix-sort-bam-args.patch'
Length of output: 78
Update
gfainject
: 0.1.0 → 0.1.1recipes/gfainject
(click to view/edit other files)This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).