Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge bitcoin#17388: Add missing newline in util_ChainMerge test
3645e4c Add missing newline in util_ChainMerge test (Russell Yanofsky) Pull request description: This was causing a lot of test cases not not be very meaningful because multiple configuration options were combined into one line. The changes in test output with this fix make sense and look like: ```diff - testnet=1 regtest=1 || test + testnet=1 regtest=1 || error: Invalid combination of -regtest, -testnet and -chain. Can use at most one. ``` Issue was reported and debugged by Wladimir J. van der Laan <[email protected]> in bitcoin#17385 (comment) <!-- *** Please remove the following help text before submitting: *** Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed immediately. --> <!-- Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience significantly: * Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome. * All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests should accompany the change. * Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug was fixed. * Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues. If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible. * Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example, most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code changes are usually rejected. --> <!-- Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so patches often sit for a long time. --> ACKs for top commit: laanwj: ACK 3645e4c practicalswift: ACK 3645e4c -- diff looks correct Tree-SHA512: ca5bde9b9f553811d4827113f4880d15d7b8f4f1455b95bbf34c9a1512fdd53062f1a2133c50d9b54f94160a1ee77a54bc82681a5f3bf25d2b0d01f8a8e95165
- Loading branch information