Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(BUX-408): admin get paymail #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dorzepowski
Copy link
Collaborator

@dorzepowski dorzepowski commented Dec 21, 2023

Pull Request Checklist

  • πŸ“– I created my PR using provided : CODE_STANDARDS
  • πŸ“– I have read the short Code of Conduct: CODE_OF_CONDUCT
  • 🏠 I tested my changes locally.
  • βœ… I have provided tests for my changes.
  • πŸ“ I have used conventional commits.
  • πŸ“— I have updated any related documentation.
  • πŸ’Ύ PR was issued based on the Github or Jira issue.

@dorzepowski dorzepowski requested a review from a team as a code owner December 21, 2023 11:13
@mergify mergify bot added the bug-P3 Lowest rated bug, affects nearly none or low-impact label Dec 21, 2023
@dorzepowski dorzepowski merged commit 96551ff into master Dec 21, 2023
6 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the fix/admin-get-paymail branch December 21, 2023 11:15
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ func (h *TransportHTTP) AdminGetPaymail(ctx context.Context, address string) (*b

var model *buxmodels.PaymailAddress
if err := h.doHTTPRequest(
ctx, http.MethodGet, "/admin/paymail/get", jsonStr, h.xPriv, true, &model,
ctx, http.MethodPost, "/admin/paymail/get", jsonStr, h.xPriv, true, &model,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?! Shouldn't we change it in server?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug-P3 Lowest rated bug, affects nearly none or low-impact
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants