Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM-11162] Assign To Collections Permission Update #11367

Merged
merged 69 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

Jingo88
Copy link
Contributor

@Jingo88 Jingo88 commented Oct 2, 2024

🎟️ Tracking

PM-11162

📔 Objective

Only users with Can Edit permissions will be allowed to Assign To Collections. If the user has Can Edit Except Password they should not see Assign To Collections in the menu of the item row.

UPDATE:
After speaking with product and design we have decided to move away from hiding Can Edit Except Passwords collections from the dropdown.

If an item belongs to only a Can Edit Except Passwords collection, the user will not see the Assign to Collections action in the item row menu, and the collections dropdown will be disabled

If an item belongs to multiple collections with a higher permission (e.g. item is in Can Edit Except Password and Can Manage) the user will see the Assign to Collections action, and the collections dropdown in the edit modal will show all available collections

📸 Screen Recording

PM-11162.mov

Desktop Permissions

PM-11162-Desktop.mov

Screenshot of CLI error when trying to add collection to Can Edit Except PW item UPDATED (shows new error text)

PM-14165-cli

Removed Assign option from Can Edit Except PW items in browser

PM-14165-browser-assign-remove.mov

Recording of Collections dropdown disable for item with only Can Edit Except PW. And dropdown available for item with multiple collections including a Manage/Edit permission.

PM-11162-edit-except-pw-PM-AC.mov

Recording for PM-17390 - When Owners/Admin Access setting is turned on, disable collection options in PM for Owners if they do not have Edit/Manage permissions

Screen.Recording.2025-01-27.at.11.14.53.AM.mov

Recording for PM-17390 - Custom User Flow in PM

PM-17390-custom-user-collection-edit-except-pw-check.mov

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 2, 2024 18:52
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.28571% with 23 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.39%. Comparing base (aeb4e21) to head (f98884f).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ult/src/components/assign-collections.component.ts 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
...lt/components/vault-items/vault-items.component.ts 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...nts/item-details/item-details-section.component.ts 75.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
libs/common/src/vault/models/view/cipher.view.ts 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
apps/cli/src/commands/edit.command.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...mponents/vault-items/vault-cipher-row.component.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...2/item-more-options/item-more-options.component.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
apps/cli/src/models/response.ts 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11367      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.39%   35.39%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3009     3009              
  Lines       90783    90807      +24     
  Branches    16868    16876       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        32137    32144       +7     
- Misses      56182    56199      +17     
  Partials     2464     2464              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details92453ffd-8963-4db9-86af-82646864e2a5

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

Copy link
Member

@shane-melton shane-melton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change to vault-items looks good!

However, we need to make a similar change to the item-details-section.component for the new CipherForm. It also allows users to modify a cipher's collections without the "Assign To Collections" dialog so we need to adjust that component to disable the collections control when !cipher.viewPassword

@Jingo88 Jingo88 added the needs-qa Marks a PR as requiring QA approval label Oct 2, 2024
@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from shane-melton October 4, 2024 19:01
return org.id === this.originalCipherView.organizationId;
});

const filteredCollections = this.originalCipherView.collectionIds.find((id) => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ this.originalCipherView can be null when creating a new cipher and this will throw.

filteredCollections?.length > 0 ||
(this.originalCipherView.edit && this.originalCipherView.viewPassword)
) {
this.showCollectionsControl = true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ We only want to disable the collection control when they don't have access to assign to other collections. Disabling allows the user to still see what its assigned to, otherwise there is no way to view that information.

@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from shane-melton October 9, 2024 18:32
@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2024 19:31
@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from eliykat October 14, 2024 19:31
Comment on lines 72 to 73
if (cipher?.organizationId == null) {
this.canAssignCollections = true;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't follow this - if the cipher isn't in an organization, you can't assign it to a collection.

shane-melton
shane-melton previously approved these changes Oct 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@shane-melton shane-melton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to go! There do seem to be a couple merge conflicts though

shane-melton
shane-melton previously approved these changes Oct 22, 2024
cd-bitwarden
cd-bitwarden previously approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cd-bitwarden cd-bitwarden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

eliykat
eliykat previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2025
@Jingo88 Jingo88 dismissed stale reviews from eliykat and cd-bitwarden via 3c9f5bb January 17, 2025 14:56
@Jingo88 Jingo88 requested a review from cd-bitwarden January 17, 2025 14:56
cd-bitwarden
cd-bitwarden previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cd-bitwarden cd-bitwarden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're most recent changes look good 👍

eliykat
eliykat previously approved these changes Jan 27, 2025
cd-bitwarden
cd-bitwarden previously approved these changes Jan 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cd-bitwarden cd-bitwarden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@cd-bitwarden cd-bitwarden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@Jingo88 Jingo88 removed the needs-qa Marks a PR as requiring QA approval label Feb 4, 2025
@Jingo88 Jingo88 merged commit 327aed9 into main Feb 4, 2025
105 of 111 checks passed
@Jingo88 Jingo88 deleted the PM-11162-assign-to-collections-perm branch February 4, 2025 20:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants