Add Bitwarden.Server.Sdk Tests

[justindbaur]

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

Add some unit tests checking that that various variants of the settings in the SDK can compile or should rightly not compile.

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – fbe98688-aaf3-4b4a-b284-9dce3c7f9d9d

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.06%. Comparing base (13351c0) to head (8b7833e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #85   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.06%   37.06%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        1071     1071           
  Branches       91       91           
=======================================
  Hits          397      397           
  Misses        642      642           
  Partials       32       32           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[withinfocus]

Is this still a draft?

I also noticed that some docs (per the Sonar results) could be added, but that should be a separate PR.

[justindbaur]

@withinfocus Nope, the issues with tests and things still targeting .NET 7 should be fixed. I think most of the things that need documentation are in Bitwarden.Core which can go away once Bitwarden.Secrets.Sdk gets v2.

[withinfocus]

Working tests: https://github.com/bitwarden/dotnet-extensions/pull/85/checks?check_run_id=36294785086