Added a new HOC in status bar in order to make sure it works on both … #1845
Conversation
…the resolution, high and low.
|
cc: @gorkemcetin @ajhollid The PR for status bars |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new functional component, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant SPC as StatusPageBarChart
participant BB as BarBox
SPC->>BB: Render bar element (passes width, height, background colour, etc.)
BB-->>SPC: Return styled Box with encapsulated properties
Suggested Reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx (1)
27-40: Great addition of a reusable BarBox component!You've created a nice HOC that encapsulates the common styling properties - this definitely helps with code organization and maintainability. My palms are sweaty just thinking about how much cleaner this makes the code.
However, there's no prop validation yet. The ESLint errors are flagging that 'width', 'height', 'backgroundColor', 'borderRadius', and 'children' are missing in props validation.
Consider adding PropTypes validation like:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types'; // After component definition BarBox.propTypes = { width: PropTypes.string.isRequired, height: PropTypes.string.isRequired, backgroundColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired, borderRadius: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number]), children: PropTypes.node };🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 27-27: 'width' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'height' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'backgroundColor' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'borderRadius' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx
[error] 27-27: 'width' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'height' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'backgroundColor' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'borderRadius' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
[error] 27-27: 'children' is missing in props validation
(react/prop-types)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx (2)
59-64: Smart unit conversion for better resolution handling!Changing from
vwtoremunits is a perfect fix for the high-resolution display issue mentioned in PR #1729. This change makes the width calculation more consistent across different screen resolutions - knees weak, arms are heavy when thinking about how this will prevent future display issues.
154-158: Consistent implementation of the BarBox componentGood job applying the same pattern here with the same unit conversion. This implementation is mom's spaghetti - I mean, it's well-executed and maintains consistency throughout the component.
Also applies to: 174-174
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business Value: Resolves high-resolution display issues on status page graphs.
- Key Components Modified:
StatusPageBarChartcomponent. - Impact Assessment: Improves user experience for high-resolution displays.
- System Dependencies and Integration Impacts: None.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx - StatusPageBarChart
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
const BarBox = ({ width, height, backgroundColor, borderRadius, children }) => (
<Box
marginRight="5px"
position="relative"
width={width}
height={height}
backgroundColor={backgroundColor}
sx={{
borderRadius: borderRadius || theme.spacing(1.5),
}}
>
{children}
</Box>
);
// ... (rest of the code)- Analysis:
- The new
BarBoxcomponent encapsulates common styling properties forBoxelements, improving code organization and maintainability. - The component is used in two instances within the
StatusPageBarChartcomponent, replacing direct usage ofBox. - The change from using viewport units (
vw) to root font size units (rem) for width calculation inBarBoxensures better responsiveness across different screen resolutions.
- The new
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
import PropTypes from 'prop-types';
const BarBox = ({ width, height, backgroundColor, borderRadius, children }) => (
<Box
marginRight="5px"
position="relative"
width={width}
height={height}
backgroundColor={backgroundColor}
sx={{
borderRadius: borderRadius || theme.spacing(1.5),
}}
>
{children}
</Box>
);
BarBox.propTypes = {
width: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
height: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
backgroundColor: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
borderRadius: PropTypes.oneOfType([PropTypes.string, PropTypes.number]),
children: PropTypes.node
};- Improvement rationale:
- Adding PropTypes validation to the
BarBoxcomponent ensures that it behaves as expected with different inputs, preventing unexpected behavior or runtime errors. - This change improves the overall robustness and maintainability of the component.
- Adding PropTypes validation to the
Core Logic Changes
- src/Components/Charts/StatusPageBarChart/index.jsx - StatusPageBarChart
- Submitted PR Code:
// ... (previous code)
<BarBox
width="calc(30rem / 25)"
height="100%"
backgroundColor={theme.palette.primary.lowContrast}
>
<Box
position="absolute"
bottom={0}
width="100%"
height={`${animate ? check.responseTime : 0}%`}
backgroundColor={
check.status
? theme.palette.success.lowContrast
: theme.palette.error.lowContrast
}
sx={{
borderRadius: theme.spacing(1.5),
transition: "height 600ms cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)",
}}
/>
</BarBox>
// ... (rest of the code)- Analysis:
- The usage of the
BarBoxcomponent in this instance demonstrates consistent application of the new component. - The change in width calculation units from
vwtoremensures better responsiveness across different screen resolutions.
- The usage of the
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements: None
- Improvement rationale: The submitted code is well-implemented and maintains consistency throughout the component. No improvements are suggested at this time.
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code Organization and Structure: Well-structured and organized, with clear separation of concerns.
- Design Patterns Usage: Appropriate use of Higher Order Components (HOC) for encapsulating common styling properties.
- Error Handling Approach: Not applicable in this PR.
- Resource Management: Not applicable in this PR.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue: Lack of PropTypes validation in the
BarBoxcomponent. - Impact: Potential unexpected behavior or runtime errors if invalid props are passed.
- Recommendation: Add PropTypes validation to the
BarBoxcomponent as suggested in the Code Logic Deep-Dive section.
- Issue: Lack of PropTypes validation in the
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning: No significant warnings identified in this PR.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability Aspects: The PR addresses maintainability concerns by introducing a reusable
BarBoxcomponent. - Readability Issues: The code is well-documented and easy to read.
- Performance Bottlenecks: Not applicable in this PR.
4. Security Assessment
- Authentication/Authorization Impacts: None.
- Data Handling Concerns: None.
- Input Validation: Not applicable in this PR.
- Security Best Practices: Follows best practices by using a consistent approach to styling and encapsulation.
- Potential Security Risks: None identified.
- Mitigation Strategies: Not applicable in this PR.
- Security Testing Requirements: Not applicable in this PR.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit Test Analysis: Not applicable in this PR.
- Integration Test Requirements: Not applicable in this PR.
- Edge Cases Coverage: The PR addresses edge cases by ensuring the
StatusPageBarChartcomponent works correctly with different screen resolutions.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
// Example test case for the BarBox component
it('renders correctly with valid props', () => {
const { render } = renderWithTheme(ThemeProvider);
const { getByTestId } = render(<BarBox width="100px" height="50px" backgroundColor="blue" />);
expect(getByTestId('bar-box')).toHaveStyle('width: 100px');
expect(getByTestId('bar-box')).toHaveStyle('height: 50px');
expect(getByTestId('bar-box')).toHaveStyle('background-color: blue');
});
// Example test case for the StatusPageBarChart component
it('renders correctly with different screen resolutions', () => {
const { render } = renderWithTheme(ThemeProvider);
const { getByTestId } = render(<StatusPageBarChart />);
// Add test cases for different screen resolutions
});- Coverage Improvements: Add unit tests for the
BarBoxcomponent and theStatusPageBarChartcomponent. - Performance Testing Needs: Not applicable in this PR.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation Updates Needed: Update the documentation for the
BarBoxcomponent and theStatusPageBarChartcomponent. - Long-term Maintenance Considerations: The introduction of the
BarBoxcomponent improves maintainability by encapsulating common styling properties. - Technical Debt and Monitoring Requirements: Not applicable in this PR.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment Impact and Strategy: The changes in this PR have minimal impact on deployment, as they only affect the
StatusPageBarChartcomponent. - Key Operational Considerations: None identified.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Add PropTypes validation to the
BarBoxcomponent to prevent unexpected behavior or runtime errors. - Write unit tests for the
BarBoxcomponent and theStatusPageBarChartcomponent to ensure they work as expected. - Update the documentation for the
BarBoxcomponent and theStatusPageBarChartcomponent to reflect the changes made in this PR.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical Evolution Path: Continue to identify and encapsulate common styling properties to improve maintainability and consistency across components.
- Business Capability Evolution: The improved responsiveness of the
StatusPageBarChartcomponent ensures that the status page graphs display correctly on high-resolution displays, enhancing the user experience. - System Integration Impacts: The changes in this PR have minimal impact on other components, as they only affect the
StatusPageBarChartcomponent.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
|
UI wise looks good to me. We'll review the code and get back to you. Thanks for this. |
…the resolution, high and low.
Describe your changes
Changes done in status bar in order to accommodate the resolution issue with styles in width of single bars.
Issue number
FE - Status Page graph not displaying well on high resolution screens #1729
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.