Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pre-check updated fields before committing outgoing sync #623

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

dangeross
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR pre-checks the updated swap against the existing swap, if some fields are updated then commit outgoing sync

(Draft while I can't test with rt-sync)

@roeierez roeierez added this to the v0.6..0 milestone Dec 23, 2024
@dangeross dangeross force-pushed the savage-updated-fields branch from 1359123 to dea34b9 Compare December 23, 2024 18:22
@dangeross dangeross changed the base branch from savage-payment-expiry to rt-sync December 23, 2024 18:22
@hydra-yse hydra-yse force-pushed the savage-updated-fields branch from dea34b9 to 125437b Compare December 24, 2024 14:35
@hydra-yse hydra-yse changed the base branch from rt-sync to main December 24, 2024 14:35
@hydra-yse hydra-yse requested a review from roeierez December 24, 2024 14:45
lib/core/src/sync/model/data.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dangeross dangeross marked this pull request as ready for review December 30, 2024 04:52
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dangeross dangeross left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@hydra-yse hydra-yse force-pushed the savage-updated-fields branch from 4fb0fc8 to c0d5562 Compare January 2, 2025 08:11
@hydra-yse hydra-yse force-pushed the savage-updated-fields branch from c0d5562 to 3ea1590 Compare January 2, 2025 08:41
@hydra-yse hydra-yse merged commit ba6c411 into main Jan 2, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants