Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken link and update OpenAI fine tunability #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1197,7 +1197,7 @@ There are many downsides to fine-tuning. If it is at all possible, take advantag

Some of the downsides include:

- **Not possible**: [GPT-3.5/GPT-4 isn’t fine tunable](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/chat/is-fine-tuning-available-for-gpt-3-5-turbo), which is the primary model / API we’ll be using, so we simply can’t lean in fine-tuning.
- **Not possible**: GPT-4 isn’t fine tunable, [though GPT-3.5 now is](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/fine-tuning/what-models-can-be-fine-tuned). As mentioned before, GPT-4 is the superior iteration of the models / APIs we’ll be using, so we simply can’t lean on fine-tuning.
- **Overhead**: Fine-tuning requires manually creating tons of data.
- **Velocity**: The iteration loop becomes much slower – every time you want to add a new capability, instead of adding a few lines to a prompt, you need to create a bunch of fake data and then run the finetune process and then use the newly fine-tuned model.
- **Cost**: It is up to 60x more expensive to use a fine-tuned GPT-3 model vs the stock `gpt-3.5-turbo` model. And it is 2x more expensive to use a fine-tuned GPT-3 model vs the stock GPT-4 model.
Expand Down