Syntax Highlighting, now Fixed silly mistake with duplicated shCore.js #80
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
we can use the file suffix to determine which syntax highlighting to use.
… pick the brush for syntax highlighting.
…the one we need for the given file type.
Added a hash of possible values to select the correct brush based on the suffix. This fixes a problem where some suffixes did not match brush aliases.
…h simpler and faster.
kelan
pushed a commit
to kelan/gitx
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2017
Replace 10.7 API with 10.6 API
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Syntax Highlighting, now Fixed silly mistake with duplicated shCore.js