Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add simple-jekyll-search, glightbox and loading-attribute-polyfill #283

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

songouyang
Copy link
Contributor

@songouyang songouyang commented Sep 25, 2024

[skip ci]

Introduced new packages

  • simple-jekyll-search
  • glightbox
  • loading-attribute-polyfill

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new libraries to enhance project functionality, including search capabilities and improved loading attributes.
  • Chores
    • Updated project dependencies in package.json.

Introduced new packages
- `simple-jekyll-search`
- `glightbox`
- `loading-attribute-polyfill`
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces three new dependencies to the package.json file: simple-jekyll-search, glightbox, and loading-attribute-polyfill. These dependencies are added with their version set to "*", indicating that the latest versions will be used. No changes to existing code or functionality are made in this update.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Added new dependencies: simple-jekyll-search, glightbox, loading-attribute-polyfill with version set to "*"

Possibly related PRs

🐰 In the garden of code, we plant new seeds,
With simple-jekyll-search, glightbox, and more,
Each line a promise, each package a deed,
Expanding our project, opening new doors!
So hop along, friends, let’s explore and delight,
In the world of dependencies, everything feels right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73a8f9a and 3377c46.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +18629 to +18631
},
"simple-jekyll-search": {
"version": "*"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider specifying a more precise version range for "simple-jekyll-search".

While using "*" allows for automatic updates to the latest version, it may lead to unexpected breaking changes. Consider using a more specific version range (e.g., "^1.0.0" or "~1.0.0") to balance between receiving updates and maintaining stability.

Comment on lines +18633 to +18635
"glightbox": {
"version": "*"
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider specifying a more precise version range for "glightbox".

Using "*" for the version can potentially introduce compatibility issues if breaking changes are introduced in future releases. It's recommended to use a more specific version range (e.g., "^3.0.0" or "~3.0.0") to ensure consistent behavior while still allowing for minor updates and patches.

Comment on lines +18636 to 18638
"loading-attribute-polyfill": {
"version": "*"
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider specifying a more precise version range for "loading-attribute-polyfill".

The use of "*" as the version specifier allows for any version of the package to be used, which could lead to unexpected behavior if breaking changes are introduced. Consider using a more specific version range (e.g., "^2.0.0" or "~2.0.0") to maintain better control over the package versions while still allowing for minor updates and patches.

Comment on lines +18629 to 18638
},
"simple-jekyll-search": {
"version": "*"
},
"glightbox": {
"version": "*"
},
"loading-attribute-polyfill": {
"version": "*"
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Unused Packages in package.json

The packages "simple-jekyll-search", "glightbox", and "loading-attribute-polyfill" are listed as dependencies in package.json but are not utilized in the current codebase or documentation. Consider removing them to optimize project performance and reduce potential security risks unless they are planned for future implementation.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the necessity and impact of adding these new packages.

The addition of these three new packages ("simple-jekyll-search", "glightbox", and "loading-attribute-polyfill") to the allowed packages list may have implications for the project. Ensure that these additions are necessary and their impact on the project has been considered, especially in terms of security and performance.

To verify the usage and necessity of these new packages, you can run the following script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of newly added packages in the project

echo "Checking for usage of 'simple-jekyll-search':"
rg --type js --type html 'simple-jekyll-search'

echo "Checking for usage of 'glightbox':"
rg --type js --type html 'glightbox'

echo "Checking for usage of 'loading-attribute-polyfill':"
rg --type js --type html 'loading-attribute-polyfill'

echo "Checking for any related configuration or documentation:"
rg --type md --type json --type yaml 'simple-jekyll-search|glightbox|loading-attribute-polyfill'

Length of output: 795

@fengmk2 fengmk2 changed the title Update package.json feat: add simple-jekyll-search, glightbox and loading-attribute-polyfill Sep 28, 2024
@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit d244756 into cnpm:master Sep 28, 2024
4 checks passed
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
[skip ci]

## [1.131.0](v1.130.0...v1.131.0) (2024-09-28)

### Features

* add cu-lowcode-multitablehead-setter ([#282](#282)) ([c7a4611](c7a4611))
* add simple-jekyll-search, glightbox and loading-attribute-polyfill ([#283](#283)) ([d244756](d244756))
This was referenced Oct 7, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants