Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve spine asset preview panel features #18154

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

knoxHuang
Copy link
Contributor

@knoxHuang knoxHuang commented Jan 10, 2025

Re: #

depends: https://github.com/cocos/cocos-editor/pull/3318

https://github.com/cocos/3d-tasks/issues/18723

Changelog

  • Improve spine asset preview panel features

Continuous Integration

This pull request:

  • needs automatic test cases check.

    Manual trigger with @cocos-robot run test cases afterward.

  • does not change any runtime related code or build configuration

    If any reviewer thinks the CI checks are needed, please uncheck this option, then close and reopen the issue.


Compatibility Check

This pull request:

  • changes public API, and have ensured backward compatibility with deprecated features.
  • affects platform compatibility, e.g. system version, browser version, platform sdk version, platform toolchain, language version, hardware compatibility etc.
  • affects file structure of the build package or build configuration which requires user project upgrade.
  • introduces breaking changes, please list all changes, affected features and the scope of violation.

@knoxHuang knoxHuang requested a review from wuzhiming January 10, 2025 03:54
Copy link

✅ Package size is not changed

Interface Check Report

This pull request does not change any public interfaces !

@knoxHuang knoxHuang requested a review from minggo January 10, 2025 09:42
@minggo minggo merged commit d1ab113 into cocos:v3.8.6 Jan 10, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants