Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DBML planning for flows and their definitions #282

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

nicosammito
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@nicosammito nicosammito added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 20, 2024
@nicosammito nicosammito self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 20, 2024

GitLab Pipeline Action

General information

Link to pipeline: https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/1428869410

Status: Passed
Duration: 6 minutes

Job summaries

rspec: [ee]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/7676509679/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/1428869410/test_report
Finished in 16.67 seconds (files took 11.37 seconds to load)
829 examples, 0 failures
2422 / 2749 LOC (88.1%) covered.
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:06.563 (29.3% of total time)

rspec: [ce]

Coverage report available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/sagittarius/-/jobs/7676509677/artifacts/tmp/coverage/index.html
Test summary available at https://gitlab.com/code0-tech/development/sagittarius/-/pipelines/1428869410/test_report
Finished in 18.08 seconds (files took 10.79 seconds to load)
782 examples, 0 failures
2274 / 2617 LOC (86.89%) covered.
[TEST PROF INFO] Time spent in factories: 00:06.201 (24.86% of total time)

docs:preview

Documentation preview available at https://code0-tech.gitlab.io/-/development/telescopium/-/jobs/7676546478/artifacts/dist/index.html

rubocop

422 files inspected, no offenses detected

@nicosammito
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Taucher2003 Is it possible to review this asap, so @raphael-goetz can move forward in aquila?

@nicosammito
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Taucher2003 maybe we should rethink some of the parts because in frontend I need this definition also

@Taucher2003
Copy link
Member

Flow definition has been developed in pictor instead. Closing this one

@Taucher2003 Taucher2003 closed this Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants