[FYST-1881] Make html consistent between az and id review of 1099 r subtractions

[arinchoi03]

Link to pivotal/JIRA issue

• https://codeforamerica.atlassian.net/browse/FYST-1881

Is PM acceptance required? (delete one)

• Yes - don't merge until JIRA issue is accepted!

Reminder: merge main into this branch and get green tests before merging to main

What was done?

• Moved the html for id retirement card from id_review to review_header to be consistent with az approach. I think it's in the Income Details section of the review, so feels like it should be in the same area.

How to test?

• Describe the testing approach taken to verify the changes, including:
  • Tests should still pass
• Specify any relevant testing environments used (e.g., development, staging, demo, Heroku).
• Use pangolin (must answer disabled: yes), potato_mfj who have eligible 1099Rs

Screenshots (for visual changes)

looks the same

[github-actions]

Heroku app: https://gyr-review-app-5660-0e48525e7c0c.herokuapp.com/
View logs: heroku logs --app gyr-review-app-5660 (optionally add --tail)

[squanto]

lgtm