feat: nanopub client for storing user enrichments

[sdevalk]

This PR introduces a new package, 'enricher'. The package allows us to store and retrieve user enrichments, i.e. information provided by users. Some notes:

1. The package is in flux. The (internal) data model for expressing user enrichments is not finished - Kinsuk is working on this. The package uses a temporary model.
2. The package can, at this moment, only store enrichments, not retrieve - this will be a part of a different PR
3. The package can, at this moment, only store a specific type of user enrichment, a 'text'. In the future we could support other types as well, e.g. a 'term' (for materials or techniques) or a 'date' (for date made).
4. The frontend should use the class Enricher for storing an enrichment - see enricher.integration.test.ts for an example.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
colonial-collections-dataset-browser	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 1, 2023 5:05am
colonial-collections-researcher	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 1, 2023 5:05am

[barbarah]

I'm not very familiar with RDF. So this part is hard for me to review. I read the code and looked up the new packages you are using.

As a user of this Enricher, I do have some questions about the schema, and how I should use the Enricher. I am aware the data model for expressing user enrichments is not finished. So we can also wait for the final data model before explaining to me how I should use the Enricher.

[barbarah]

Where does this creator url come from? Is this a Clerk organization? They have GUIDs but no URLs. Or will we use a different system to connect the Clerk organization to this Enricher?

And do we need to save both the user and the community? Or only the community?

[sdevalk]

Good question! We will probably have to add a new field to the 'Communities' UI. Users can then provide their IRI. This IRI comes from some world-wide user identification system such as ORCID. It could also be that only community administrators need to provide this IRI; the IRI will then identify the community, not an individual user.

[barbarah]

I'm trying to understand what values should be placed in about. Looking at the integration tests, this is a URI to the object. Or maybe a subpart of an object (for example, the description of an object)?

[sdevalk]

Yes, this is the 'big unknown' in the design of the user enrichments at this moment. An enrichment is about a specific bit of information, such as the title or the date made of an object - it's not about the object as a whole. This means that the properties of an object need to have identifiers (= IRIs). But the props currently don't have these (not in the API, not in the underlying data). Kinsuk is looking into this. For the time being - while developing and testing - we can invent some identifiers (I'll discuss this with Kinsuk and make a proposal).